Meireles Sônia Saeger, Goettems Marília Leão, Dantas Raquel Venâncio Fernandes, Bona Álvaro Della, Santos Iná S, Demarco Flávio Fernando
Department of Operative Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba, Brazil.
Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.022. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
This study aimed to assess changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in individuals enroled in a double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two carbamide peroxide concentrations used in at-home vital bleaching in the city of Pelotas, Southern Brazil.
Ninety-two volunteers with a shade mean of C1 or darker for the six maxillary anterior teeth were randomized into two balanced groups (n=46) according to bleaching agent concentration: 10% or 16% carbamide peroxide. The patients were instructed to use the whitening agent in a tray for 2h once a day for three weeks. To assess changes in OHRQoL, participants completed the oral impact on daily performance (OIDP) at the start and one week after the completion of treatment. Because there was no difference with regard to whitening effect or tooth sensitivity during or after treatment the two groups were merged for the analyses of the current article. Before-and-after changes in OIDP scores were assessed by chi-square and McNemar tests (p<0.05).
Mean pre- and post-treatment OIDP scores varied from 0.42 to 0.60. When the frequency of impacts for different activities were compared, there was an increase in difficulty in cleaning teeth (p=0.02) and a significant reduction in smiling and showing teeth with embarrassment (p=0.03). Regarding the symptoms and main oral conditions that generated impact, there was higher number of participants reporting pain (p=0.05) after treatment. In opposite, significant decrease was observed in individuals reporting being unhappy with their appearance (p=0.03). On the contrary, it was showed a decrease in impacts resulting from dental colour was observed after bleaching (p=0.03).
Quality of life is complex and encompasses different domains. Although positive impact of the dental bleaching was detected, with patients showing more their teeth without embarrassment, difficult in dental hygiene and pain resulting from the treatment were also reported, and this can negatively impact daily performances. Dentists must consider these aspects when performing aesthetics procedures.
本研究旨在评估参与一项双盲随机临床试验的个体口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的变化。该试验旨在评估巴西南部佩洛塔斯市家庭冷光美白中使用的两种过氧化脲浓度的疗效和安全性。
92名上颌前六颗牙齿平均色度为C1或更深的志愿者,根据漂白剂浓度随机分为两个均衡组(n = 46):10%或16%过氧化脲。患者被指示每天在托盘里使用美白剂2小时,持续三周。为评估OHRQoL的变化,参与者在治疗开始时和治疗结束后一周完成日常口腔功能影响(OIDP)评估。由于治疗期间和治疗后两组在美白效果或牙齿敏感度方面没有差异,因此将两组合并用于本文分析。通过卡方检验和McNemar检验评估OIDP评分的前后变化(p<0.05)。
治疗前和治疗后的OIDP平均评分从0.42变化至0.60。比较不同活动的影响频率时,刷牙困难增加(p = 0.02),微笑和露齿时尴尬感显著降低(p = 0.03)。关于产生影响的症状和主要口腔状况,治疗后报告疼痛的参与者数量增加(p = 0.05)。相反,报告对自己外表不满意的个体显著减少(p = 0.03)。相反,漂白后观察到牙齿颜色产生的影响减少(p = 0.03)。
生活质量是复杂的,涵盖不同领域。虽然检测到牙齿美白有积极影响,患者更自在地露齿,但也报告了口腔卫生困难和治疗引起的疼痛,这可能对日常表现产生负面影响。牙医在进行美容程序时必须考虑这些方面。