Sagamore Hills Children's Psychiatric Hospital, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 1980 Jun;9(3):249-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02088469.
The question addressed is whether individuals operating at the Postconventional level of moral reasoning behave appreciatively different from those functioning at lower moral maturity levels. The types of behaviors reported in the literature are classified in five areas: resistance to temptation, resistance to social influence/authority, student activism, prosocial behavior, and antisocial behavior. The data suggest that evidence linking Kohlbergian moral development to differential behaviors is remote. However, the link between moral reasoning and behavior is not positively nonexistent. There remain several factors which probably affect the findings in all five behavioral categories, especially the sparsity of subjects at the principled level and the limited range of behaviors investigated.
本文探讨的问题是，处于后习俗道德推理水平的个体与处于较低道德成熟水平的个体相比，是否表现出明显不同的行为。文献中报告的行为类型被分为五个领域：抵制诱惑、抵制社会影响/权威、学生激进主义、亲社会行为和反社会行为。数据表明，将科尔伯格的道德发展与不同行为联系起来的证据是遥不可及的。然而，道德推理与行为之间的联系并非完全不存在。在所有五个行为类别中，仍有几个因素可能会影响研究结果，尤其是原则水平的受试者数量稀少和所研究的行为范围有限。
