• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

破裂性腹主动脉瘤:血管腔内修复的适用性与开放修复后较低的死亡率相关。

Ruptured AAA: suitability for endovascular repair is associated with lower mortality following open repair.

作者信息

Barnes R, Kassianides X, Barakat H, Mironska E, Lakshminarayan R, Chetter I C

机构信息

Academic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, 1st Floor Main Tower Block, Anlaby Road, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK,

出版信息

World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1223-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2393-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-013-2393-y
PMID:24318409
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Perioperative mortality of open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) remains unacceptably high: 30-day mortality ≈ 40 %. This study aimed to assess, quantify, and determine the consequences of anatomic suitability for endovascular repair of rAAA.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of the prospectively maintained database identified patients with rAAA.

METHODS

Preoperative CT scans were assessed for anatomic suitability for emergency EVAR and precluding factors recorded. Demographic information was collected and analysed for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients underwent open surgical repair of rAAA. Forty-six patients had preoperative CT scans suitable for reconstruction. Morphological measurements indicated that 41 % would have been anatomically suitable for EVAR. Suitability was associated with lower mortality rates than unsuitability: 0, 11, and 20 % (24 h, 30 days, and 1 year respectively) versus 11, 33, and 59 % (statistically significant at 1 year; p = 0.02). The groups were comparable excepting diabetes incidence, which was higher in those suitable for EVAR (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

A minority of patients with ruptured AAA are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Anatomical suitability appears to identify patients at low risk from open surgery. Whether this is due to technically less demanding open surgery is unknown. This may be resolved by the IMPROVE trial results, which are eagerly awaited.

摘要

目的

腹主动脉瘤破裂(rAAA)开放修复术的围手术期死亡率仍然高得令人难以接受:30天死亡率约为40%。本研究旨在评估、量化并确定rAAA血管腔内修复术的解剖学适宜性的后果。

设计

对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,以确定rAAA患者。

方法

评估术前CT扫描对急诊血管腔内修复术的解剖学适宜性,并记录排除因素。收集并分析所有患者的人口统计学信息。

结果

共有141例患者接受了rAAA开放手术修复。46例患者术前CT扫描适合重建。形态学测量表明,41%的患者在解剖学上适合血管腔内修复术。适宜组的死亡率低于不适宜组:分别为0%、11%和20%(24小时、30天和1年),而不适宜组为11%、33%和59%(1年时具有统计学意义;p = 0.02)。除糖尿病发病率外,两组具有可比性,适合血管腔内修复术的患者糖尿病发病率更高(p = 0.003)。

结论

少数rAAA患者在解剖学上适合血管腔内修复术。解剖学适宜性似乎可以识别出开放手术风险较低的患者。这是否是由于开放手术技术要求较低尚不清楚。这可能会通过备受期待的IMPROVE试验结果得到解决。

相似文献

1
Ruptured AAA: suitability for endovascular repair is associated with lower mortality following open repair.破裂性腹主动脉瘤:血管腔内修复的适用性与开放修复后较低的死亡率相关。
World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1223-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2393-y.
2
One-Year Outcomes after Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair: Is Endovascular Aortic Repair the Best Choice? A Single-Center Experience.腹主动脉瘤破裂修复术后一年的结果:血管内主动脉修复是最佳选择吗?单中心经验。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;53:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
Retroperitoneal hematoma volume is a good predictor of perioperative mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹膜后血肿量是血管内动脉瘤修复治疗破裂腹主动脉瘤术后围手术期死亡率的良好预测指标。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):998-1006.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.048.
4
Operative Mortality and Morbidity in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Endovascular Age.血管内时代腹主动脉瘤破裂的手术死亡率和发病率
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.073. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
A comparison of open surgery versus endovascular repair of unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.开放性手术与血管腔内修复术治疗不稳定破裂腹主动脉瘤的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Dec;60(6):1439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.122. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
Outcome after open surgery repair in endovascular-suitable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.适合血管腔内修复术的破裂腹主动脉瘤患者接受开放手术修复后的结局。
Vasa. 2013 Nov;42(6):442-8. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000314.
7
Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001-2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume.美国腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内治疗(2001 - 2006年):与开放修复相比具有显著生存获益,且与机构手术量增加独立相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):817-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
8
Anatomic suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair.破裂性腹主动脉瘤行血管腔内修复术的解剖学适宜性。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;22(6):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
9
Prior endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair provides no survival benefits when the aneurysm ruptures.在腹主动脉瘤破裂时,先前的血管内腹主动脉瘤修复并不能提供生存获益。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.099. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
10
Population-based long-term outcomes of open versus endovascular aortic repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.基于人群的开放手术与血管内修复治疗破裂腹主动脉瘤的长期结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun;71(6):1867-1878.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.212. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Suitability of the Aortic Neck Anatomy for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Korean Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.韩国腹主动脉瘤患者腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术的主动脉颈部解剖结构适用性
Vasc Specialist Int. 2020 Jun 30;36(2):71-81. doi: 10.5758/vsi.200016.
2
Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: The Suitability of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Does Not Influence Operative Mortality.破裂腹主动脉瘤的开放修复术:血管内动脉瘤修复术的适用性不影响手术死亡率。
Vasc Specialist Int. 2015 Sep;31(3):81-6. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2015.31.3.81. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
EVAR suitability is not a predictor for early and midterm mortality after open ruptured AAA repair.EVAR 的适宜性并不能预测开放型破裂性腹主动脉瘤修复术后的早期和中期死亡率。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 May;41(5):647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
2
Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤开放或血管内修复的长期结果。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1881-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909499.
3
Anatomical suitability for endovascular AAA repair may affect outcomes following rupture.
解剖学适合性可能会影响腹主动脉瘤破裂后腔内修复的结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;40(2):186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.04.002.
4
The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines.腹主动脉瘤患者的护理:血管外科学会实践指南
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4 Suppl):S2-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.002.
5
Anatomic suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair.破裂性腹主动脉瘤行血管腔内修复术的解剖学适宜性。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;22(6):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
6
Endovascular ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVRAR): a systematic review.血管内破裂腹主动脉瘤修复术(EVRAR):一项系统评价
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Dec;34(6):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
7
The Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial: suitability and application rate for endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.阿姆斯特丹急性动脉瘤试验:破裂腹主动脉瘤血管内修复的适用性和应用率
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):679-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
8
A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm - results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies.腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内手术与开放手术随机试验——一项初步研究的结果及对未来研究的经验教训
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Nov;32(5):506-13; discussion 514-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
9
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm reduces intraoperative cortisol and perioperative morbidity.腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复可降低术中皮质醇水平及围手术期发病率。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Jun;41(6):919-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.02.040.
10
Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial.腹主动脉瘤患者血管内动脉瘤修复术与开放修复术的比较(EVAR试验1),30天手术死亡率结果:随机对照试验
Lancet. 2004;364(9437):843-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16979-1.