Cortis Kelvin, Miraglia Roberto, Maruzzelli Luigi, Gerasia Roberta, Tafaro Corrado, Luca Angelo
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), Via Ernesto Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy,
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Aug;37(4):1078-82. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0814-9. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
To determine whether grid removal during routine biliary interventional procedures performed in a flat-panel interventional suite results in adequate image quality and a significant decrease of patient radiation exposure.
Routine biliary interventional procedures were defined as those in which absence of fine image detail during fluoroscopy carries no procedural impact, including substitution of internal-external biliary drains (n = 25) or bilioplasty of benign biliary anastomotic strictures (n = 5). All patients had undergone a previous procedure in which the grid was used. Constant object-to-detector and source-to-image distance were maintained in each patient during the grid/no-grid procedures. The same fluoroscopy protocol was used for all examinations. The dose area product (DAP [cGy.cm(2)]) and procedure fluoroscopy time (seconds) were recorded for each procedure. DAP was normalized per unit of fluoroscopy time (nDAP [cGy.cm(2)/s]).
In all procedures, image quality was considered adequate by two different interventional radiologists, and all procedures were successfully completed without significant changes in fluoroscopy time between the two groups (p = 0.13). In every procedure without the grid, nDAP was inferior compared with nDAP in procedures performed using the grid. The mean decrease in dose was 39.2 ± 23.5 % (p = 0.000001).
Our preliminary data show that removal of the grid during routine biliary procedures is feasible and results in a significant decrease of patient radiation exposure. This seems of particular relevance because most of these patients require frequent reintervention. Larger studies with more procedures are warranted to confirm these data.
确定在平板介入套件中进行常规胆道介入手术时去除滤线栅是否能产生足够的图像质量并显著降低患者的辐射暴露。
常规胆道介入手术定义为透视时缺乏精细图像细节对手术无影响的手术,包括更换内外胆道引流管(n = 25)或良性胆道吻合口狭窄的胆管成形术(n = 5)。所有患者之前均接受过使用滤线栅的手术。在有滤线栅/无滤线栅的手术过程中,每位患者的物体到探测器和源到图像的距离保持恒定。所有检查均使用相同的透视方案。记录每个手术的剂量面积乘积(DAP [cGy.cm²])和手术透视时间(秒)。DAP按透视时间单位进行标准化(nDAP [cGy.cm²/s])。
在所有手术中,两名不同的介入放射科医生均认为图像质量足够,并且所有手术均成功完成,两组之间的透视时间无显著变化(p = 0.13)。在每例不使用滤线栅的手术中,nDAP均低于使用滤线栅进行的手术中的nDAP。剂量平均降低39.2 ± 23.5%(p = 0.000001)。
我们的初步数据表明,在常规胆道手术中去除滤线栅是可行的,并且能显著降低患者的辐射暴露。这似乎特别重要,因为这些患者中的大多数需要频繁进行再次干预。需要进行更多手术的更大规模研究来证实这些数据。