Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉钙化积分对心肌灌注成像解读的影响。

The influence of coronary calcium score on the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging.

作者信息

Mouden Mohamed, Ottervanger Jan Paul, Timmer Jorik R, Reiffers Stoffer, Oostdijk Ad H J, Knollema Siert, Jager Pieter L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Isala klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands,

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Apr;21(2):368-74. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9825-9. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores influence the pre-test likelihood of ischemia in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). We investigated the influence of CAC score knowledge on the visual interpretation of MPI in patients referred for the diagnostic work-up of suspected coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed symptomatic patients who were referred for MPI. For the current analysis, we selected 151 patients who underwent SPECT MPI with simultaneous CAC scoring. MPI was visually interpreted in two separate sessions, first without and then with knowledge of the CAC score. MPI results were classified into four groups: normal, fixed defects, ischemia, and equivocal.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 64 ± 11 years, 56% were male. Without knowledge of the CAC score MPI was evaluated as normal in 36%, compared to 40% with knowledge of the CAC score (P = 0.636). Overall, the addition of the CAC score changed the interpretation of MPI in 56 patients (37%). Importantly, the frequency of equivocal MPI interpretations decreased from 21% without knowledge of CAC score to 9% with knowledge of CAC score (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the CAC score has a major impact on the interpretation of MPI, increasing the interpretative certainty.

摘要

目的

冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分影响接受心肌灌注成像(MPI)患者缺血的检查前可能性。我们研究了CAC评分知识对因疑似冠状动脉疾病接受诊断性检查的患者MPI视觉解读的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了因MPI而被转诊的有症状患者。对于当前分析,我们选择了151例行SPECT MPI并同时进行CAC评分的患者。MPI在两个独立的环节进行视觉解读,首先在不知道CAC评分的情况下,然后在知道CAC评分的情况下。MPI结果分为四组:正常、固定缺损、缺血和不明确。

结果

患者的平均年龄为64±11岁,56%为男性。在不知道CAC评分的情况下,36%的MPI被评估为正常,而在知道CAC评分的情况下这一比例为40%(P = 0.636)。总体而言,56例患者(37%)的MPI解读因加入CAC评分而改变。重要的是,不明确的MPI解读频率从不知道CAC评分时的21%降至知道CAC评分时的9%(P = 0.002)。

结论

CAC评分知识对MPI解读有重大影响,提高了解读的确定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验