Aparicio V A, Segura-Jiménez V, Alvarez-Gallardo I C, Estévez-López F, Camiletti-Moirón D, Latorre P A, Delgado-Fernández M, Carbonell-Baeza A
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain,
Rheumatol Int. 2014 Jun;34(6):811-21. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2908-8. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Obesity may influence fibromyalgia severity. The present study aimed to examine fibromyalgia (FM) symptomatology, quality of life (QoL), and functional capacity across obesity class categories. A total sample of 208 obese FM patients and 108 obese control women were included in the study. The sample was further categorized following the international criteria for obesity classes: obesity I (BMI 30.0-34.99 kg/m(2)), obesity II (BMI 35.0-39.99 kg/m(2)), and obesity III (BMI ≥40.0 kg/m(2)). QoL was assessed by means of the Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and FM symptomatology with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Standardized field-based fitness tests were used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, flexibility, agility, and balance. All the dimensions of QoL, as measured by SF-36, were worse in obese FM patients compared to the obese control group (all p < 0.001). Obese FM patients also scored worse in the entire functional capacity tests studied (all p < 0.001). Except for the higher FIQ-depression across obesity status categories (p < 0.05), no differences between obesity status groups were found in QoL and FM impact. However, upper-body muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness were worse across obesity class categories and pairwise comparisons showed differences mainly between obesity I and II (p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively). The absence of clear differences in QoL and FM symptomatology among obesity classes suggests that just avoiding any obese status may be a useful advice for a better management of the disease. Nevertheless, upper-body muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness, which are important health indicators highly related to the mortality risk, were worse across obesity categories.
肥胖可能会影响纤维肌痛的严重程度。本研究旨在探讨不同肥胖等级分类中的纤维肌痛(FM)症状、生活质量(QoL)和功能能力。该研究纳入了208名肥胖的纤维肌痛患者和108名肥胖的对照女性作为总样本。样本根据国际肥胖等级标准进一步分类:I级肥胖(BMI 30.0 - 34.99 kg/m²)、II级肥胖(BMI 35.0 - 39.99 kg/m²)和III级肥胖(BMI≥40.0 kg/m²)。采用简明健康调查问卷(SF - 36)评估生活质量,并用纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)评估纤维肌痛症状。使用基于现场的标准化体能测试来评估心肺适能、肌肉力量、柔韧性、敏捷性和平衡能力。与肥胖对照组相比,肥胖纤维肌痛患者通过SF - 36测量的所有生活质量维度均较差(所有p < 0.001)。肥胖纤维肌痛患者在所有研究的功能能力测试中的得分也较低(所有p < 0.001)。除了不同肥胖状态类别之间纤维肌痛影响问卷中的抑郁得分较高(p < 0.05)外,在生活质量和纤维肌痛影响方面未发现肥胖状态组之间存在差异。然而,不同肥胖等级分类中的上肢肌肉力量和心肺适能较差,两两比较显示主要在I级肥胖和II级肥胖之间存在差异(分别为p < 0.05和p < 0.01)。肥胖等级之间在生活质量和纤维肌痛症状方面没有明显差异,这表明避免任何肥胖状态可能是更好管理该疾病的有用建议。然而,上肢肌肉力量和心肺适能作为与死亡风险高度相关的重要健康指标,在不同肥胖类别中均较差。