• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于共识的国家公共卫生认证方法。

A consensus-based approach to national public health accreditation.

作者信息

Ingram Richard C, Bender Kaye, Wilcox Robin, Kronstadt Jessica

机构信息

Department of Health Services Management, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington (Dr Ingram); and Public Health Accreditation Board, Alexandria, Virginia (Dr Bender and Mss Wilcox and Kronstadt).

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a0b8f9.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a0b8f9
PMID:24322679
Abstract

The Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) solicited (and continues to solicit) the input of more than 400 subject matter experts in various areas of public health during the development and ongoing revision of the accreditation standards and measures. This process is designed to ensure that the standards and measures remain relevant and accommodate the various contexts under which public health departments practice in the United States. One way PHAB gathers feedback is convening a series of discussion meetings, or think tanks, with thought leaders in specific areas of public health, that focus on specific programmatic areas of public health, on the broader context of public health practice, or on emerging issues, such as public health informatics. The think tanks complement other mechanisms to assure that standards and measures are relevant, including gathering input from the practice community, receiving recommendations from public health departments that have undergone the accreditation process, and reviewing relevant literature. While this process allows PHAB to demonstrate its commitment to continuous quality improvement by modifying and improving the standards and measures, it also serves as a communication vehicle for PHAB to educate thought leaders and public health practitioners about the national accreditation program.

摘要

在制定和持续修订认证标准及措施的过程中,公共卫生认证委员会(PHAB)征求了(并将继续征求)400多名公共卫生各领域主题专家的意见。这一过程旨在确保标准和措施保持相关性,并适应美国公共卫生部门开展业务的各种环境。PHAB收集反馈的一种方式是与公共卫生特定领域的思想领袖召开一系列讨论会或智囊团会议,这些会议聚焦于公共卫生的特定规划领域、公共卫生实践的更广泛背景或诸如公共卫生信息学等新出现的问题。智囊团补充了其他确保标准和措施相关性的机制,包括收集实践社区的意见、接收已通过认证过程的公共卫生部门的建议以及审查相关文献。虽然这一过程使PHAB能够通过修改和完善标准及措施来展示其对持续质量改进的承诺,但它也作为一种沟通工具,让PHAB能够向思想领袖和公共卫生从业者宣传国家认证计划。

相似文献

1
A consensus-based approach to national public health accreditation.一种基于共识的国家公共卫生认证方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a0b8f9.
2
Public health accreditation addresses issues facing the public health workforce.公共卫生认证解决了公共卫生工作人员面临的问题。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Nov;47(5 Suppl 3):S346-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
Guiding the way to public health improvement: exploring the connections between The Community Guide's Evidence-Based Interventions and health department accreditation standards.引领公共卫生改善之路:探索《社区指南》的循证干预措施与卫生部门认证标准之间的联系。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):104-10. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182aa444c.
4
Accreditation and emergency preparedness: linkages and opportunities for leveraging the connections.认证与应急准备:建立联系及利用这些联系的机会。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):119-24. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a9dbd8.
5
Performance management models for public health: Public Health Accreditation Board/Baldrige connections, alignment, and distinctions.公共卫生绩效管理模型:公共卫生认证委员会/波多里奇奖的联系、一致性及差异
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):128-34. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182aa184e.
6
Quality improvement coaching to build capacity within health departments: reflections and recommendations.通过质量改进指导提升卫生部门能力:反思与建议
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):52-6. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182aa653a.
7
Public health department accreditation implementation: transforming public health department performance.公共卫生部门认证实施:转变公共卫生部门绩效。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Feb;102(2):237-42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300375. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Evaluating the Impact of National Public Health Department Accreditation - United States, 2016.评估国家公共卫生部门认证的影响 - 美国,2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Aug 12;65(31):803-6. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6531a3.
9
Cross-jurisdictional approaches to meeting PHAB standards and achieving accreditation.跨辖区实现公共卫生机构评审委员会(PHAB)标准并获得认证的方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):138-40. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a7bd91.
10
Public health department accreditation: setting the research agenda.公共卫生部门认证:制定研究议程。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Mar;42(3):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.021.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of the Chief Health Strategist in community health improvement: a MAPP 2.0 counterproposal.首席健康策略师在社区健康改善中的作用:一份MAPP 2.0反提案。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 9;13:1601406. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601406. eCollection 2025.
2
The Information Imperative for Public Health: A Call to Action to Become Informatics-Savvy.公共卫生的信息需求:呼吁采取行动以精通信息学
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Nov/Dec;24(6):586-589. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000892.
3
Behavioral Health, Local Health Department Accreditation, and Public Health 3.0: Leveraging Opportunities for Collaboration.
行为健康、地方卫生部门认证和公共卫生 3.0:利用合作机会。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1334-1340. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304533. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Leadership for Public Health 3.0: A Preliminary Assessment of Competencies for Local Health Department Leaders.《公共卫生3.0领导力:地方卫生部门领导者能力的初步评估》
Front Public Health. 2017 Oct 16;5:272. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00272. eCollection 2017.
5
State and Local Health Department Activities Related to Abortion: A Web Site Content Analysis.州和地方卫生部门与堕胎相关的活动:网站内容分析。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 May/Jun;24(3):255-262. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000647.
6
Public health accreditation: rubber stamp or roadmap for improvement.公共卫生认证:橡皮图章还是改进路线图。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S353-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302568. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
Marshaling the evidence: the prioritized public health accreditation research agenda.收集证据:优先考虑的公共卫生认证研究议程。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S153-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302247. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Effects of performance improvement programs on preparedness capacities.绩效改进计划对准备能力的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):19-27. doi: 10.1177/00333549141296S404.
9
Instrumental roles of governance in accreditation: responsibilities of public health governing entities.治理在认证中的工具性作用:公共卫生管理实体的职责
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):61-3. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a45141.