Capek Daniel, Metscher Brian D, Müller Gerd B
Department of Theoretical Biology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; Institute of Science and Technology, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2014 Jan;322(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22545. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
Avian forelimb digit homology remains one of the standard themes in comparative biology and EvoDevo research. In order to resolve the apparent contradictions between embryological and paleontological evidence a variety of hypotheses have been presented in recent years. The proposals range from excluding birds from the dinosaur clade, to assignments of homology by different criteria, or even assuming a hexadactyl tetrapod limb ground state. At present two approaches prevail: the frame shift hypothesis and the pyramid reduction hypothesis. While the former postulates a homeotic shift of digit identities, the latter argues for a gradual bilateral reduction of phalanges and digits. Here we present a new model that integrates elements from both hypotheses with the existing experimental and fossil evidence. We start from the main feature common to both earlier concepts, the initiating ontogenetic event: reduction and loss of the anterior-most digit. It is proposed that a concerted mechanism of molecular regulation and developmental mechanics is capable of shifting the boundaries of hoxD expression in embryonic forelimb buds as well as changing the digit phenotypes. Based on a distinction between positional (topological) and compositional (phenotypic) homology criteria, we argue that the identity of the avian digits is II, III, IV, despite a partially altered phenotype. Finally, we introduce an alternative digit reduction scheme that reconciles the current fossil evidence with the presented molecular-morphogenetic model. Our approach identifies specific experiments that allow to test whether gene expression can be shifted and digit phenotypes can be altered by induced digit loss or digit gain.
鸟类前肢指的同源性仍然是比较生物学和进化发育生物学(EvoDevo)研究中的标准主题之一。为了解决胚胎学和古生物学证据之间明显的矛盾,近年来提出了各种假说。这些提议范围广泛,从将鸟类排除在恐龙类群之外,到根据不同标准进行同源性分配,甚至假设六指四足动物肢体的基态。目前有两种方法占主导地位:框架转移假说和金字塔缩减假说。前者假定指身份发生了同源异型转变,而后者则主张指骨和指逐渐进行双侧缩减。在这里,我们提出了一个新模型,该模型将这两种假说的要素与现有的实验和化石证据整合在一起。我们从这两个早期概念共有的主要特征,即起始个体发育事件开始:最前端指的缩减和丢失。有人提出,分子调控和发育力学的协同机制能够改变胚胎前肢芽中hoxD表达的边界,以及改变指的表型。基于位置(拓扑)和组成(表型)同源性标准之间的区别,我们认为鸟类指的身份是II、III、IV,尽管表型有部分改变。最后,我们引入了一种替代的指缩减方案,该方案使当前的化石证据与所提出的分子形态发生模型相协调。我们的方法确定了具体的实验,这些实验可以测试基因表达是否可以通过诱导指的丢失或增加而发生改变以及指的表型是否可以改变。