Meyer-Losic Florence, Newman Simon P, Day Joanna M, Reed Michael J, Kasprzyk Philip G, Purohit Atul, Foster Paul A
IPSEN Innovation, IPSEN, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 6;8(12):e80305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080305. eCollection 2013.
Despite paclitxael's clinical success, treating hormone-refractory breast cancer remains challenging. Paclitaxel has a poor pharmacological profile, characterized by a low therapeutic index (TIX) caused by severe dose limiting toxicities, such as neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Consequently, new drugs are urgently required. STX140, a compound previously shown to have excellent efficacy against many tumors, is here compared to paclitaxel in three translational in vivo breast cancer models, a rat model of peripheral neuropathy, and through pharmacological testing. Three different in vivo mouse models of breast cancer were used; the metastatic 4T1 orthotopic model, the C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag model, and the MDA-MB-231 xenograft model. To determine TIX and pharmacological profile of STX140, a comprehensive dosing regime was performed in mice bearing MDA-MD-231 xenografts. Finally, peripheral neuropathy was examined using a rat plantar thermal hyperalgesia model. In the 4T1 metastatic model, STX140 and paclitaxel significantly inhibited primary tumor growth and lung metastases. All C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag mice in the control and paclitaxel treated groups developed palpable mammary cancer. STX140 blocked 47% of tumors developing and significantly inhibited growth of tumors that did develop. STX140 treatment caused a significant (P<0.001) survival advantage for animals in early and late intervention groups. Conversely, in C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag mice, paclitaxel failed to inhibit tumor growth and did not increase survival time. Furthermore, paclitaxel, but not STX140, induced significant peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. These results show that STX140 has a greater anti-cancer efficacy, TIX, and reduced neurotoxicity compared to paclitaxel in C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag mice and therefore may be of significant benefit to patients with breast cancer.
尽管紫杉醇在临床上取得了成功,但治疗激素难治性乳腺癌仍然具有挑战性。紫杉醇的药理学特性不佳,其治疗指数(TIX)较低,原因是存在严重的剂量限制性毒性,如中性粒细胞减少和周围神经病变。因此,迫切需要新的药物。STX140是一种先前已显示对多种肿瘤具有优异疗效的化合物,本文在三种转化性体内乳腺癌模型、一种周围神经病变大鼠模型中,并通过药理学测试,将其与紫杉醇进行了比较。使用了三种不同的体内乳腺癌小鼠模型;转移性4T1原位模型、C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag模型和MDA-MB-231异种移植模型。为了确定STX140的TIX和药理学特性,在携带MDA-MD-231异种移植瘤的小鼠中进行了全面的给药方案。最后,使用大鼠足底热痛觉过敏模型检查周围神经病变。在4T1转移模型中,STX140和紫杉醇均显著抑制原发性肿瘤生长和肺转移。对照和紫杉醇治疗组中的所有C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag小鼠都出现了可触及的乳腺癌。STX140阻止了47%的肿瘤发生,并显著抑制了已发生肿瘤的生长。STX140治疗使早期和晚期干预组的动物具有显著的(P<0.001)生存优势。相反,在C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag小鼠中,紫杉醇未能抑制肿瘤生长,也未增加生存时间。此外,紫杉醇而非STX140诱导了显著的周围神经病变和中性粒细胞减少。这些结果表明,在C3(1)/SV40 T-Ag小鼠中,与紫杉醇相比,STX140具有更大的抗癌疗效、TIX,且神经毒性降低,因此可能对乳腺癌患者具有显著益处。