Suppr超能文献

回顾性病历审查:重要的方法学考量

The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations.

作者信息

Vassar Matt, Holzmann Matthew

机构信息

Office of Educational Development, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013 Nov 30;10:12. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.12. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

In this paper, we review and discuss ten common methodological mistakes found in retrospective chart reviews. The retrospective chart review is a widely applicable research methodology that can be used by healthcare disciplines as a means to direct subsequent prospective investigations. In many cases in this review, we have also provided suggestions or accessible resources that researchers can apply as a "best practices" guide when planning, conducting, or reviewing this investigative method.

摘要

在本文中,我们回顾并讨论了回顾性病历审查中发现的十个常见方法学错误。回顾性病历审查是一种广泛适用的研究方法,医疗保健学科可将其用作指导后续前瞻性调查的手段。在本次审查的许多案例中,我们还提供了建议或可获取的资源,研究人员在规划、开展或审查这种调查方法时可将其作为“最佳实践”指南加以应用。

相似文献

1
The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations.回顾性病历审查:重要的方法学考量
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013 Nov 30;10:12. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.12. eCollection 2013.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Developing great research questions.提出优秀的研究问题。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Sep 1;65(17):1667-70. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070276.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验