• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多准则决策分析在评估孤儿药价值中的初步研究。

A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines.

机构信息

Office of Health Economics, London, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.002
PMID:24326170
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To pilot the use of multicriteria decision analysis to establish and apply a framework of weighted attributes to value orphan medicinal products.

METHODS

Literature searches on the natural history and burden of 40 rare diseases and of how payers assess treatment value and three workshops with, respectively, GlaxoSmithKline managers working on orphan medicinal products, European Union clinical and health economics experts, and representatives of rare diseases patient groups in the European Union.

RESULTS

Eight nonmonetary attributes were identified and weights agreed: four concern the disease being treated and four the treatment itself. About half of the weight went to attributes of the disease treated and half to attributes of the treatment. Patient group representatives gave greater weight than did the experts to patients' and carers' quality of daily life.

CONCLUSIONS

The multicriteria decision analysis approach piloted works and could be developed for use by payers and health technology assessment bodies.

摘要

目的

试点使用多准则决策分析来建立和应用加权属性框架,以评估孤儿药物的价值。

方法

对 40 种罕见疾病的自然史和负担进行文献检索,以及对支付者如何评估治疗价值进行三次研讨会,分别涉及葛兰素史克公司从事孤儿药物的管理人员、欧盟临床和卫生经济学专家以及欧盟罕见疾病患者群体的代表。

结果

确定了 8 个非货币属性并达成了权重共识:其中 4 个与治疗的疾病有关,4 个与治疗本身有关。约一半的权重用于治疗疾病的属性,另一半用于治疗的属性。与专家相比,患者群体代表更重视患者和照顾者的日常生活质量。

结论

试点使用的多准则决策分析方法有效,并可由支付者和卫生技术评估机构开发使用。

相似文献

1
A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines.多准则决策分析在评估孤儿药价值中的初步研究。
Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
2
Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.中东欧国家罕见病药物评估标准的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jun 4;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6.
3
Multicriteria decision analysis in the reimbursement of new medical technologies: real-world experiences from Hungary.新型医疗技术报销中的多标准决策分析:来自匈牙利的实际经验。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):487-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
4
Dealing with Uncertainty and Accounting for Social Value Judgments in Assessments of Orphan Drugs: Evidence from Four European Countries.处理罕见病药物评估中的不确定性并考虑社会价值判断:来自四个欧洲国家的证据
Value Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(7):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
International experiences in multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for evaluating orphan drugs: a scoping review.用于评估孤儿药的多标准决策分析(MCDA)的国际经验:一项范围综述。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Aug;19(4):409-420. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1633918. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
6
SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIAL VALUE JUDGMENTS FOR ORPHAN DRUGS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.卫生技术评估中孤儿药的科学与社会价值判断
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):218-232. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000416. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries.为何针对相同药物的卫生技术评估覆盖建议在不同地区存在差异?应用混合方法框架对四个欧洲国家的罕见病药物决策进行系统比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;18(6):715-730. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0823-0. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
8
HTA programme response to the challenges of dealing with orphan medicinal products: Process evaluation in selected European countries.HTA 项目应对孤儿药挑战的反应:选定欧洲国家的过程评估。
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
9
Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs.评估罕见病药物带来的经济挑战。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Winter;23(1):36-42. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307051550.
10
Determinants of orphan drugs prices in France: a regression analysis.法国孤儿药价格的决定因素:一项回归分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Apr 21;12(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0561-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of a multiple criteria decision analysis framework for prioritizing high-impact health technologies in a regional health service.用于对区域卫生服务中具有高影响力的卫生技术进行优先排序的多标准决策分析框架设计
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Apr 5;40(1):e21. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000205.
2
How Can We Optimize the Value Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs for Reimbursement Purposes? A Qualitative Interview Study Across European Countries.我们如何优化用于报销目的的罕见病药物价值评估和评价?一项对欧洲国家的定性访谈研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 19;13:902150. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.902150. eCollection 2022.
3
Knowledge Mapping of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis.
医疗保健中的多准则决策分析知识图谱:文献计量分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:895552. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895552. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluating the Benefits of New Drugs in Health Technology Assessment Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study on Metastatic Prostate Cancer With the Dental and Pharmaceuticals Benefits Agency (TLV) in Sweden.使用多标准决策分析评估卫生技术评估中新药的益处:以瑞典牙科和药品福利局(TLV)对转移性前列腺癌的案例研究为例。
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Sep 15;3(2):2381468318796218. doi: 10.1177/2381468318796218. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
5
How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.如何评估罕见病药物的价值?欧洲价值评估框架综述。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 12;12:631527. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.631527. eCollection 2021.
6
Criteria and Scoring Functions Used in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Value Frameworks for the Assessment of Rare Disease Therapies: A Systematic Literature Review.多标准决策分析和价值框架中用于评估罕见病疗法的标准及评分函数:一项系统文献综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Dec;5(4):605-612. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00271-w. Epub 2021 May 18.
7
A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study).多利益相关者多准则决策分析孤儿药的报销(FinMHU-MCDA 研究)。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Apr 26;16(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01809-1.
8
Potential Criteria for Frameworks to Support the Evaluation of Innovative Medicines in Upper Middle-Income Countries-A Systematic Literature Review on Value Frameworks and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses.支持中高收入国家创新药物评估的框架潜在标准——关于价值框架和多标准决策分析的系统文献综述
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 14;11:1203. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01203. eCollection 2020.
9
Establishing a reasonable price for an orphan drug.为孤儿药制定合理价格。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Sep 4;18:31. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00223-x. eCollection 2020.
10
Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎药物研发中的早期卫生技术评估:两轮跨国多标准决策分析。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Aug;40(6):830-845. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20940672.