da Costa Miranda Vanessa, Braghiroli Maria Ignez, Faria Luiza Dib Batista Bugiato, Siqueira Sheila Aparecida Coelho, Sabbaga Jorge, Hoff Paulo M, Riechelmann Rachel P
Disciplina de Radiologia e Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 251,12o andar, São Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014 Mar;45(1):80-6. doi: 10.1007/s12029-013-9568-5.
In oncology, we tend to look for factors that reflect better prognosis or predict response to treatments in order to make a selection from which patients will derive the benefit, avoiding futile therapies and/or toxicities. Definitive prognostic and predictive factors in advanced biliary cancer remain unknown.
We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients in our institution with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with palliative cisplatin plus gemcitabine. We evaluated the prognostic and predictive role of the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of ERCC1 (excision cross-complementing gene-1) on tumor response and also examined several clinical and laboratory prognostic factors for overall survival.
From January 2009 to July 2011, 72 patients were identified; their median overall survival was 9.5 months. Independent variables associated with shorter survival identified by the multivariable Cox regression analysis were ECOG 2-3 (HR 8.4; 95% CI 3.4 to 20.7; p < 0.001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index >1 (HR 9.5; 95% CI 1.6 to 55.3; p = 0.012). Pathology slides were available from 44 patients: 23 (52%) stained positive for ERCC1 on IHC (score ≥0.5). In this subgroup, expression of ERCC-1 was not prognostic and was not associated with either clinical benefit (partial response and stable disease) or tumor response (partial response only) to chemotherapy.
In this cohort of unselected patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin, IHC expression of ERCC1 was not either predictive or prognostic. Patients with ECOG 2-3 and/or multiple comorbidities had worse survival.
在肿瘤学领域,我们倾向于寻找能够反映更好预后或预测治疗反应的因素,以便从中挑选出能获益的患者,避免无效治疗和/或毒性反应。晚期胆管癌的确切预后和预测因素仍不明确。
我们回顾性分析了我院所有接受姑息性顺铂联合吉西他滨治疗的晚期胆管癌连续患者。我们评估了ERCC1(切除修复交叉互补基因-1)免疫组化(IHC)表达对肿瘤反应的预后和预测作用,并研究了几个临床和实验室的总生存预后因素。
2009年1月至2011年7月,共纳入72例患者;他们的中位总生存期为9.5个月。多变量Cox回归分析确定的与较短生存期相关的独立变量为美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分为2 - 3分(风险比[HR] 8.4;95%置信区间[CI] 3.4至20.7;p < 0.001)和查尔森合并症指数>1(HR 9.5;95% CI 1.6至55.3;p = 0.012)。44例患者有病理切片:23例(52%)在免疫组化中ERCC1染色呈阳性(评分≥0.5)。在该亚组中,ERCC-1的表达既不是预后因素,也与化疗的临床获益(部分缓解和疾病稳定)或肿瘤反应(仅部分缓解)无关。
在这组接受一线吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗的未经选择的晚期胆管癌患者中,ERCC1的免疫组化表达既无预测性也无预后性。ECOG评分为2 - 3分和/或有多种合并症的患者生存期较差。