Bailey Amy Kate, Snedker Karen A
Utah State University.
AJS. 2011 Nov;117(3). doi: 10.1086/661985.
This project employs a moral solidarity framework to explore the relationship between organized religion and lynching in the American South. We ask whether a county's religious composition impacted its rate of lynching, net of demographic and economic controls. We find evidence for the solidarity thesis using three religious metrics. First, our findings show that counties with greater religious diversity experienced more lynching, supporting the notion that a pluralistic religious marketplace with competing religious denominations weakened the bonds of a cohesive moral community and might have enhanced white racial solidarity. Second, counties in which a larger share of the black population worshipped in churches controlled by blacks experienced higher levels of racial violence, indicating a threat to the prevailing moral community or inter-group racially based solidarity. Finally, we find a lower incidence of lynching in counties where a larger share of church members belonged to denominations with racially mixed denominations, suggesting that cross-racial solidarity served to reduce racial violence.
本项目采用道德团结框架来探究美国南部有组织宗教与私刑之间的关系。我们探讨在排除人口和经济因素的影响后,一个县的宗教构成是否会影响其私刑发生率。我们使用三个宗教指标为团结论点找到了证据。首先,我们的研究结果表明,宗教多样性更高的县私刑事件更多,这支持了这样一种观点,即存在相互竞争的宗教教派的多元宗教市场削弱了凝聚性道德社区的纽带,可能增强了白人的种族团结。其次,在黑人人口中较大比例在由黑人控制的教堂做礼拜的县,种族暴力程度更高,这表明对占主导地位的道德社区或基于群体间种族的团结构成了威胁。最后,我们发现,在教会成员中较大比例属于种族混合教派的县,私刑发生率较低,这表明跨种族团结有助于减少种族暴力。