Blackhall Leslie J, Erickson Jeanne, Brashers Valentina, Owen John, Thomas Shannon
1 University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, Virginia.
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;17(1):68-74. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0262. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
Helping families make end-of-life decisions requires close collaboration between physicians and nurses. However, medical and nursing students have little formal training in how to collaborate in this task, and few instruments are available to measure collaborative behaviors.
The objective of this project was to develop and validate observational assessment tools to measure specific interprofessional competencies in medical and nursing students related to end-of-life discussions.
A literature search for evidence-based guidelines and competencies and focus groups with an expert panel of nurses and physicians were used to outline best collaborative practice behaviors for nurses and physicians in an end-of-life decision making simulation. The panel used these practice-behavior checklists to rate videotaped student scenarios and then refined the checklists for validity and clarity until the tools had acceptable inter-rater reliability.
The setting was a workshop teaching end-of-life communication to third-year nursing and medical students.
Inter-rater reliability was measured using percent agreement and kappa; internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha.
Collaborative behaviors objective assessment tools (CBOATs) for nursing and medical students were developed. For the medical CBOAT we found 85% agreement between raters, with an overall kappa of 0.744 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.806. For the nursing CBOAT there was 81% agreement, with a kappa of 0.686 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.845.
Development of an end-of-life CBOAT clarified the important collaborative behaviors needed by physician and nurse. The resulting instruments provide a helpful guide for teaching interprofessional sessions related to the end of life and measuring student outcomes using an objective strategy.
帮助家庭做出临终决策需要医生和护士密切合作。然而,医学和护理专业的学生在如何进行这项任务的合作方面几乎没有接受过正规培训,而且几乎没有可用的工具来衡量合作行为。
本项目的目的是开发和验证观察性评估工具,以衡量医学和护理专业学生在临终讨论方面的特定跨专业能力。
通过对基于证据的指南和能力进行文献检索,并与护士和医生专家小组进行焦点小组讨论,以勾勒出在临终决策模拟中护士和医生的最佳合作实践行为。该小组使用这些实践行为清单对录制的学生场景进行评分,然后完善清单以确保有效性和清晰度,直到这些工具具有可接受的评分者间信度。
该背景是一个为三年级护理和医学专业学生教授临终沟通的工作坊。
使用一致率和kappa系数来测量评分者间信度;使用Cronbach's alpha系数来测量内部一致性。
开发了针对护理和医学专业学生的合作行为客观评估工具(CBOATs)。对于医学CBOAT,我们发现评分者之间的一致率为85%,总体kappa系数为0.744,Cronbach's alpha系数为0.806。对于护理CBOAT,一致率为81%,kappa系数为0.686,Cronbach's alpha系数为0.845。
临终CBOAT的开发明确了医生和护士所需的重要合作行为。由此产生的工具为教授与临终相关的跨专业课程以及使用客观策略衡量学生成果提供了有益的指导。