Michalak E E, Guiraud-Diawara A, Sapin C
Mood Disorders Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Apr;30(4):711-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.874988. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
To evaluate the baseline impact of episode type (manic vs. mixed), defined using DSM-IV-TR criteria, in bipolar I disorder (BD-I) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and to investigate the differential effect of asenapine vs. placebo and olanzapine on HRQoL in BD-I patients with mixed episodes.
In two identically designed 3 week, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo- and olanzapine-controlled trials of asenapine, HRQoL was assessed using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) administered at baseline and endpoint. In addition to evaluating the impact of clinical presentation (manic vs. mixed episodes) on baseline HRQoL, the impact of treatment intervention on HRQoL was assessed via analysis of covariance models at study endpoint, with center and treatment-by-diagnosis interaction as fixed effect and baseline score as covariates.
A total of 960 BD-I patients (asenapine: 372; olanzapine: 391; placebo: 197) were included in the two studies. The observed burden of disease on HRQoL was substantial compared to general US population norms, particularly in patients experiencing mixed episodes. The greatest impairments were observed in the mental domains of HRQoL (Mental Component Summary scores: mixed = 31.9; manic = 42.8). For patients with mixed episodes, when compared to olanzapine, asenapine treatment was associated with improvements noted in every domain, which did not reach statistical significance except for Vitality (asenapine = 55.0, olanzapine = 51.3; p = 0.014) and Role-Emotional (asenapine = 44.8, olanzapine = 40.3; p = 0.020). Compared to placebo patients with mixed episodes, asenapine treatment provided significant improvements (p < 0.05) in Bodily Pain (asenapine = 50.9, placebo = 45.9), Social Functioning (asenapine = 44.1, placebo = 39.6) and Mental Health (asenapine = 46.6, placebo = 42.7) by Week 3; by comparison, olanzapine treatment did not lead to significant improvements in any domain of HRQoL compared to placebo.
Post-hoc analyses of two trials showed that BD-I patients with mixed episodes reported considerable impairments in HRQoL compared to patients with manic episodes. At 3 weeks, in patients with mixed episodes, asenapine was shown to lead to significant improvements in HRQoL compared to olanzapine and placebo. Results from these post-hoc analyses should be confirmed in prospective studies.
NCT00159744, NCT00159796.
使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)标准定义发作类型(躁狂发作与混合发作),评估其对双相I型障碍(BD-I)患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的基线影响,并研究阿立哌唑与安慰剂及奥氮平相比,对混合发作的BD-I患者HRQoL的差异效应。
在两项设计相同的为期3周的阿立哌唑随机、双盲、灵活剂量、安慰剂和奥氮平对照试验中,使用在基线和终点时进行的36项简明健康调查(SF-36v2)评估HRQoL。除了评估临床表现(躁狂发作与混合发作)对基线HRQoL的影响外,在研究终点通过协方差模型分析评估治疗干预对HRQoL的影响,将中心和治疗与诊断的交互作用作为固定效应,基线分数作为协变量。
两项研究共纳入960例BD-I患者(阿立哌唑:372例;奥氮平:391例;安慰剂:197例)。与美国普通人群标准相比,观察到的疾病对HRQoL的负担较重,尤其是在混合发作的患者中。在HRQoL的精神领域观察到最大损害(精神成分汇总得分:混合发作=31.9;躁狂发作=42.8)。对于混合发作的患者,与奥氮平相比,阿立哌唑治疗在各个领域均有改善,除活力领域(阿立哌唑=55.0,奥氮平=51.3;p=0.014)和角色-情感领域(阿立哌唑=44.8,奥氮平=40.3;p=(此处原文缺失))外,均未达到统计学意义。与混合发作的安慰剂患者相比,阿立哌唑治疗在第3周时在身体疼痛(阿立哌唑=50.9,安慰剂=45.9)、社会功能(阿立哌唑=44.1,安慰剂=39.6)和心理健康(阿立哌唑=46.6,安慰剂=42.7)方面有显著改善(p<0.05);相比之下,与安慰剂相比,奥氮平治疗在HRQoL的任何领域均未导致显著改善。
两项试验的事后分析表明,与躁狂发作的患者相比,混合发作的BD-I患者报告的HRQoL损害相当严重。在3周时,对于混合发作的患者,与奥氮平和安慰剂相比,阿立哌唑显示可导致HRQoL显著改善。这些事后分析的结果应在前瞻性研究中得到证实。
NCT00159744,NCT00159796。