• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传染病的系统评价和荟萃分析:值得特别关注的主题。

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infectious diseases: topics that merit special attention.

机构信息

Department of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Centre, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Feb;20(2):101-4. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12497.

DOI:10.1111/1469-0691.12497
PMID:24329938
Abstract

As in other disciplines in medicine, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) in infectious diseases are an important aid to clinical decision-making. In the present article we review features important to SRs in infectious diseases that should be addressed in most SRs and MAs. We stress the need to include in the SR analysis all patients that were randomized; and all studies that were performed. Authors of SRs should choose one main outcome that matters to patients, and base their conclusions mainly on this outcome. Resistance as an outcome is a topic that should be addressed in all SRs of antibiotic treatment. Ethical aspects and especially patients' safety should be addressed in SRs.

摘要

与医学其他学科一样,传染病领域的系统评价(SR)和荟萃分析(MA)也是临床决策的重要辅助手段。本文回顾了传染病领域 SR 和 MA 中最重要的特点,这些特点应在大多数 SR 和 MA 中得到体现。我们强调,SR 分析中应纳入所有随机分组的患者和所有开展的研究。SR 作者应选择一个对患者重要的主要结局,并主要基于该结局得出结论。耐药性作为一个结局,应该在所有抗生素治疗的 SR 中得到体现。SR 中应涉及伦理问题,特别是患者安全问题。

相似文献

1
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infectious diseases: topics that merit special attention.传染病的系统评价和荟萃分析:值得特别关注的主题。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Feb;20(2):101-4. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12497.
2
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infectious diseases: how are they done and what are their strengths and limitations?传染病领域的系统评价与荟萃分析:它们是如何开展的,其优势与局限性又是什么?
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Jun;23(2):181-94. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2009.01.002.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.针对同一外科主题的冗余系统评价:一项荟萃流行病学调查的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e017411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017411.
5
Assessment for Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Field of Hepatology.肝脏病学领域系统评价和Meta分析的偏倚风险评估
Gut Liver. 2015 Nov 23;9(6):701-6. doi: 10.5009/gnl14451.
6
The Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment and Management Published in the Sexual Medicine Literature.性医学文献中发表的勃起功能障碍治疗和管理的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量。
J Sex Med. 2019 Mar;16(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.高影响力耳鼻喉科期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学质量。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Nov;163(5):892-905. doi: 10.1177/0194599820924621. Epub 2020 May 26.
8
Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.系统评价和荟萃分析在睡眠时间与高血压关联中的方法学和报告质量评估。
Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 6;13(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02622-0.
9
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.护理期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析对PRISMA声明的认可情况及质量:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e013905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905.
10
Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.摘要分析方法有助于筛选银屑病干预措施中方法学质量低和偏倚风险高的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0460-z.