James Buchanan Brady Foundation, Department of Urology and Division of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):11-23. doi: 10.1111/bju.12121.
The urinary reconstructive options available after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer are discussed, as are the criteria for selection of the most appropriate diversion, and the outcomes and complications associated with different diversion options.
To critically review the peer-reviewed literature on the function and oncological outcomes, complications, and factors influencing choice of procedure with urinary diversion after RC for bladder carcinoma.
A Medline search was conducted to identify original articles, review articles, and editorials on urinary diversion in patients treated with RC. Searches were limited to the English language. Keywords included: 'bladder cancer', 'cystectomy', 'diversion', 'neobladder', and 'conduit'. The articles with the highest level of evidence were selected and reviewed, with the consensus of all of the authors of this paper.
Both continent and incontinent diversions are available for urinary reconstruction after RC. In appropriately selected patients, an orthotopic neobladder permits the elimination of an external stoma and preservation of body image without compromising cancer control. However, the patient must be fully educated and committed to the labour-intensive rehabilitation process. He must also be able to perform self-catheterisation if necessary. When involvement of the urinary outflow tract by tumour prevents the use of an orthotopic neobladder, a continent cutaneous reservoir may still offer the opportunity for continence albeit one that requires obligate self-catheterisation. For patients who are not candidates for continent diversion, the ileal loop remains an acceptable and reliable option.
Both continent and incontinent diversions are available for urinary reconstruction after RC. Orthotopic neobladders optimally preserve body image, while continent cutaneous diversions represent a reasonable alternative. Ileal conduits represent the fastest, easiest, least complication-prone, and most commonly performed urinary diversion.
本文讨论了膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后的尿路重建选择,以及选择最合适的转流方式的标准,以及不同转流方式相关的结果和并发症。
批判性地回顾关于膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后尿路重建的功能和肿瘤学结果、并发症以及影响手术方式选择的因素的同行评议文献。
对关于接受根治性膀胱切除术的患者的尿路转流的原始文章、综述文章和社论进行了 Medline 搜索。检索仅限于英语。关键词包括:“膀胱癌”、“膀胱切除术”、“转流”、“新膀胱”和“导管”。选择并审查了具有最高证据水平的文章,并由本文所有作者达成共识。
RC 后可进行有控制和无控制的两种尿流改道术。在适当选择的患者中,原位新膀胱可以消除外部造口并保持身体形象,而不会影响癌症控制。然而,患者必须接受充分的教育,并承诺进行艰苦的康复过程。如果需要,他还必须能够进行自我导尿。如果肿瘤累及尿路出口,使原位新膀胱无法使用,则有控制的皮肤储尿器仍可提供控尿机会,尽管需要强制性自我导尿。对于不能进行有控制的尿流改道的患者,回肠襻仍然是一种可接受且可靠的选择。
RC 后可进行有控制和无控制的两种尿流改道术。原位新膀胱可最佳地保留身体形象,而有控制的皮肤尿流改道是合理的替代方案。回肠造口术是最快、最简单、并发症最少、最常见的尿流改道术。