Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jan 1;88(1):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.10.020.
To investigate whether coaching patients' breathing would improve the match between ITVMIP (internal target volume generated by contouring in the maximum intensity projection scan) and ITV10 (generated by combining the gross tumor volumes contoured in 10 phases of a 4-dimensional CT [4DCT] scan).
Eight patients with a thoracic tumor and 5 patients with an abdominal tumor were included in an institutional review board-approved prospective study. Patients underwent 3 4DCT scans with: (1) free breathing (FB); (2) coaching using audio-visual (AV) biofeedback via the Real-Time Position Management system; and (3) coaching via a spirometer system (Active Breathing Coordinator or ABC). One physician contoured all scans to generate the ITV10 and ITVMIP. The match between ITVMIP and ITV10 was quantitatively assessed with volume ratio, centroid distance, root mean squared distance, and overlap/Dice coefficient. We investigated whether coaching (AV or ABC) or uniform expansions (1, 2, 3, or 5 mm) of ITVMIP improved the match.
Although both AV and ABC coaching techniques improved frequency reproducibility and ABC improved displacement regularity, neither improved the match between ITVMIP and ITV10 over FB. On average, ITVMIP underestimated ITV10 by 19%, 19%, and 21%, with centroid distance of 1.9, 2.3, and 1.7 mm and Dice coefficient of 0.87, 0.86, and 0.88 for FB, AV, and ABC, respectively. Separate analyses indicated a better match for lung cancers or tumors not adjacent to high-intensity tissues. Uniform expansions of ITVMIP did not correct for the mismatch between ITVMIP and ITV10.
In this pilot study, audio-visual biofeedback did not improve the match between ITVMIP and ITV10. In general, ITVMIP should be limited to lung cancers, and modification of ITVMIP in each phase of the 4DCT data set is recommended.
研究指导患者呼吸是否会改善内部靶区体积(由最大密度投影扫描中勾画生成)与 ITV10(由勾画的 4DCT 扫描 10 个相位的大体肿瘤体积生成)之间的匹配。
在一项机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究中,纳入 8 例胸部肿瘤患者和 5 例腹部肿瘤患者。患者接受 3 次 4DCT 扫描:(1)自由呼吸(FB);(2)使用实时位置管理系统的视听(AV)生物反馈进行指导;(3)使用呼吸运动控制器(ABC)进行指导。一位医生勾画所有扫描以生成 ITV10 和 ITVMIP。通过体积比、质心距离、均方根距离和重叠/骰子系数定量评估 ITVMIP 和 ITV10 之间的匹配。我们研究了指导(AV 或 ABC)或 ITVMIP 的均匀扩展(1、2、3 或 5mm)是否可以改善匹配。
尽管 AV 和 ABC 两种指导技术都提高了频率再现性,并且 ABC 提高了位移规律性,但与 FB 相比,这两种技术均未改善 ITVMIP 和 ITV10 之间的匹配。平均而言,ITVMIP 低估 ITV10 分别为 19%、19%和 21%,质心距离分别为 1.9mm、2.3mm 和 1.7mm,Dice 系数分别为 0.87、0.86 和 0.88,分别用于 FB、AV 和 ABC。单独的分析表明,对于肺癌或不与高强度组织相邻的肿瘤,匹配效果更好。ITVMIP 的均匀扩展并不能纠正 ITVMIP 和 ITV10 之间的不匹配。
在这项初步研究中,视听生物反馈并没有改善 ITVMIP 和 ITV10 之间的匹配。一般来说,ITVMIP 应仅限于肺癌,并且建议在 4DCT 数据集的每个相位中修改 ITVMIP。