Suppr超能文献

基于18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描及原发性胸段食管癌的四维计算机断层扫描最大密度投影图像的靶区几何差异。

Geometrical differences in target volumes based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography maximum intensity projection images of primary thoracic esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Guo Y, Li J, Wang W, Zhang Y, Wang J, Duan Y, Shang D, Fu Z

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(8):744-50. doi: 10.1111/dote.12247. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare geometrical differences of target volumes based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) maximum intensity projection (MIP) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) images of primary thoracic esophageal cancer for radiation treatment. Twenty-one patients with thoracic esophageal cancer sequentially underwent contrast-enhanced three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT), 4DCT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT thoracic simulation scans during normal free breathing. The internal gross target volume defined as IGTVMIP was obtained by contouring on MIP images. The gross target volumes based on PET/CT images (GTVPET ) were determined with nine different standardized uptake value (SUV) thresholds and manual contouring: SUV≥2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 (SUVn); ≥20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40% of the maximum (percentages of SUVmax, SUVn%). The differences in volume ratio (VR), conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI) between IGTVMIP and GTVPET were investigated. The mean centroid distance between GTVPET and IGTVMIP ranged from 4.98 mm to 6.53 mm. The VR ranged from 0.37 to 1.34, being significantly (P<0.05) closest to 1 at SUV2.5 (0.94), SUV20% (1.07), or manual contouring (1.10). The mean CI ranged from 0.34 to 0.58, being significantly closest to 1 (P<0.05) at SUV2.0 (0.55), SUV2.5 (0.56), SUV20% (0.56), SUV25% (0.53), or manual contouring (0.58). The mean DI of GTVPET in IGTVMIP ranged from 0.61 to 0.91, and the mean DI of IGTVMIP in GTVPET ranged from 0.34 to 0.86. The SUV threshold setting of SUV2.5, SUV20% or manual contouring yields the best tumor VR and CI with internal-gross target volume contoured on MIP of 4DCT dataset, but 3DPET/CT and 4DCT MIP could not replace each other for motion encompassing target volume delineation for radiation treatment.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较基于原发性胸段食管癌的四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)最大强度投影(MIP)和18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET/CT)图像的靶区几何差异,用于放射治疗。21例胸段食管癌患者在正常自由呼吸期间依次接受了对比增强三维计算机断层扫描(3DCT)、4DCT和18F-FDG PET/CT胸部模拟扫描。通过在MIP图像上勾画轮廓获得定义为IGTVMIP的内部大体靶区体积。基于PET/CT图像的大体靶区体积(GTVPET)通过九个不同的标准化摄取值(SUV)阈值和手动勾画轮廓来确定:SUV≥2.0、2.5、3.0、3.5(SUVn);≥最大SUV值的20%、25%、30%、35%、40%(SUVmax的百分比,SUVn%)。研究了IGTVMIP和GTVPET之间的体积比(VR)、适形指数(CI)和包容度(DI)的差异。GTVPET和IGTVMIP之间的平均质心距离在4.98毫米至6.53毫米之间。VR范围为0.37至1.34,在SUV2.5(0.94)处最接近1,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),SUV20%(1.07)或手动勾画轮廓(1.10)时也是如此。平均CI范围为0.34至0.58,在SUV2.0(0.55)、SUV2.5(0.56)、SUV20%(0.56)、SUV25%(0.53)或手动勾画轮廓(0.58)时最接近1,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GTVPET在IGTVMIP中的平均DI范围为0.61至0.91,IGTVMIP在GTVPET中的平均DI范围为0.34至0.86。SUV2.5、SUV20%或手动勾画轮廓的SUV阈值设置在基于4DCT数据集MIP勾画内部大体靶区轮廓时产生最佳的肿瘤VR和CI,但3DPET/CT和4DCT MIP在用于放射治疗的运动包含靶区勾画时不能相互替代。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验