Slain Tamara, Rickard-Aasen Sherry, Pringle Janice L, Hegde Gajanan G, Shang Jennifer, Johnjulio William, Venkat Arvind
Pittsburgh, PA.
Pittsburgh, PA.
J Emerg Nurs. 2014 Nov;40(6):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) could be incorporated into the emergency nursing workflow using a computerized physician order entry/clinical decision support system. We report demographic and operational factors associated with failure to initiate the protocol and revenue collection from SBIRT.
We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort analysis of a protocol adding SBIRT to the emergency nursing workflow of a single, tertiary care urban emergency department for all adult patient visits in 2012. Emergency nurses prescreened for unhealthy alcohol or drug use during triage assessment and, when positive, administered SBIRT during treatment area care, all documented in the computerized physician order entry/clinical decision support system. Using multivariable logistic regression, we report demographic and operational factors associated with failure to initiate the protocol. From October 2012, we submitted charges for brief interventions and analyzed collection results.
The inclusion criteria were met for 47,693 visits. Of these, 39,758 (83.4%) received triage protocol initiation. Variables associated with decreased odds of protocol initiation were younger age (odds ratio [OR] for rising age, 1.044; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.042-1.045), arrival by ambulance (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.35-0.40), and higher triage acuity (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.07-0.09). Of visits with protocol initiation, 21.4% were documented as positive for at-risk alcohol and/or drug use. However, brief interventions were only administered during 971 visits. During the billing period, $3617.53 was collected on charges of $10,829.15 for 262 completed brief interventions.
In this study electronic documentation of adults with at-risk alcohol and/or drug use was feasible by emergency nurses, but SBIRT execution and subsequent revenue collection were challenging.
本研究的目的是评估能否使用计算机化医嘱录入/临床决策支持系统将筛查、简短干预及转介治疗(SBIRT)纳入急诊护理工作流程。我们报告了与未能启动该方案及SBIRT收入收取相关的人口统计学和操作因素。
我们对2012年一家城市三级护理急诊科所有成年患者就诊时将SBIRT添加到急诊护理工作流程的方案进行了回顾性观察队列分析。急诊护士在分诊评估期间对不健康饮酒或药物使用情况进行预筛查,若结果为阳性,则在治疗区域护理期间实施SBIRT,所有情况均记录在计算机化医嘱录入/临床决策支持系统中。我们使用多变量逻辑回归报告与未能启动该方案相关的人口统计学和操作因素。从2012年10月起,我们提交了简短干预的费用并分析了收取结果。
47693次就诊符合纳入标准。其中,39758次(83.4%)启动了分诊方案。与方案启动几率降低相关的变量包括年龄较小(年龄每增加一岁的比值比[OR]为1.044;95%置信区间[CI]为1.042 - 1.045)、乘救护车到达(OR为0.37;95% CI为0.35 - 0.40)以及分诊 acuity 较高(OR为0.08;95% CI为0.07 - 0.09)。在启动方案的就诊中,21.4%被记录为有风险饮酒和/或药物使用呈阳性。然而,仅在971次就诊中实施了简短干预。在计费期间,262次完成的简短干预收取了10829.15美元费用中的3617.53美元。
在本研究中,急诊护士对有风险饮酒和/或药物使用的成年人进行电子记录是可行的,但SBIRT的执行及后续收入收取具有挑战性。