Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, 215 Glenbrook Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Mar;64:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
Uncovering the temporal trend in crash counts provides a good understanding of the context for pedestrian safety. With a rareness of pedestrian crashes it is impossible to investigate monthly temporal effects with an individual segment/intersection level data, thus the time dependence should be derived from the aggregated level data. Most previous studies have used annual data to investigate the differences in pedestrian crashes between different regions or countries in a given year, and/or to look at time trends of fatal pedestrian injuries annually. Use of annual data unfortunately does not provide sufficient information on patterns in time trends or seasonal effects. This paper describes statistical methods uncovering patterns in monthly pedestrian crashes aggregated on urban roads in Connecticut from January 1995 to December 2009. We investigate the temporal behavior of injury severity levels, including fatal (K), severe injury (A), evident minor injury (B), and non-evident possible injury and property damage only (C and O), as proportions of all pedestrian crashes in each month, taking into consideration effects of time trend, seasonal variations and VMT (vehicle miles traveled). This type of dependent multivariate data is characterized by positive components which sum to one, and occurs in several applications in science and engineering. We describe a dynamic framework with vector autoregressions (VAR) for modeling and predicting compositional time series. Combining these predictions with predictions from a univariate statistical model for total crash counts will then enable us to predict pedestrian crash counts with the different injury severity levels. We compare these predictions with those obtained from fitting separate univariate models to time series of crash counts at each injury severity level. We also show that the dynamic models perform better than the corresponding static models. We implement the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) approach to enable fast Bayesian posterior computation. Taking CO injury severity level as a baseline for the compositional analysis, we conclude that there was a noticeable shift in the proportion of pedestrian crashes from injury severity A to B, while the increase for injury severity K was extremely small over time. This shift to the less severe injury level (from A to B) suggests that the overall safety on urban roads in Connecticut is improving. In January and February, there was some increase in the proportions for levels A and B over the baseline, indicating a seasonal effect. We found evidence that an increase in VMT would result in a decrease of proportions over the baseline for all injury severity levels. Our dynamic model uncovered a decreasing trend in all pedestrian crash counts before April 2005, followed by a noticeable increase and a flattening out until the end of the fitting period. This appears to be largely due to the behavior of injury severity level A pedestrian crashes.
揭示事故数量的时间趋势可以很好地了解行人安全的背景。由于行人事故的罕见性,不可能用个体路段/交叉口的数据集来调查每月的时间效应,因此时间依赖性应该从汇总数据集推导出来。大多数先前的研究都使用年度数据来调查给定年份不同地区或国家之间的行人事故差异,以及/或每年调查行人重伤的时间趋势。使用年度数据不幸的是,无法提供有关时间趋势或季节性影响模式的足够信息。本文描述了从 1995 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月在康涅狄格州城市道路上汇总的每月行人事故的统计方法。我们调查了伤害严重程度水平(包括致命伤(K)、重伤(A)、明显轻伤(B)和非明显可能伤害和仅财产损失(C 和 O))的时间行为,作为每个月所有行人事故的比例,同时考虑时间趋势、季节性变化和 VMT(车辆行驶里程)的影响。这种依赖多元数据的类型以正分量之和为一为特征,并且在科学和工程中的几个应用中出现。我们描述了一个带有向量自回归(VAR)的动态框架,用于对组合时间序列进行建模和预测。将这些预测与用于总事故计数的单变量统计模型的预测相结合,然后使我们能够预测具有不同伤害严重程度水平的行人事故计数。我们将这些预测与拟合每个严重程度水平的事故计数时间序列的单独单变量模型的预测进行比较。我们还表明,动态模型比相应的静态模型表现更好。我们实施了集成嵌套拉普拉斯近似(INLA)方法,以实现快速贝叶斯后验计算。以 CO 伤害严重程度水平作为组合分析的基线,我们得出的结论是,行人事故从严重程度 A 到 B 的比例发生了明显变化,而随着时间的推移,严重程度 K 的增加非常小。这种从较严重伤害程度(从 A 到 B)向较轻伤害程度的转变表明,康涅狄格州城市道路的整体安全性正在提高。在 1 月和 2 月,基线水平 A 和 B 的比例略有增加,表明存在季节性影响。我们发现证据表明,VMT 的增加会导致所有伤害严重程度水平的比例低于基线。我们的动态模型在 2005 年 4 月之前揭示了所有行人事故数量的下降趋势,随后明显增加,直到拟合期结束才趋于平稳。这似乎主要是由于严重程度 A 行人事故的行为所致。