Lee Taewoo, Biddle Andrea K, Lionaki Sofia, Derebail Vimal K, Barbour Sean J, Tannous Sameer, Hladunewich Michelle A, Hu Yichun, Poulton Caroline J, Mahoney Shannon L, Charles Jennette J, Hogan Susan L, Falk Ronald J, Cattran Daniel C, Reich Heather N, Nachman Patrick H
1] UNC Kidney Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA [2] Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kidney Int. 2014 Jun;85(6):1412-20. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.476. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
Primary membranous nephropathy is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolic events, which are inversely correlated with serum albumin levels. To evaluate the potential benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation (venous thromboembolic events prevented) relative to the risk (major bleeds), we constructed a Markov decision model. The venous thromboembolic event risk according to serum albumin was obtained from an inception cohort of 898 patients with primary membranous nephropathy. Risk estimates of hemorrhage were obtained from a systematic literature review. Benefit-to-risk ratios were predicted according to bleeding risk and serum albumin. This ratio increased with worsening hypoalbuminemia from 4.5:1 for an albumin under 3 g/dl to 13.1:1 for an albumin under 2 g/dl in patients at low bleeding risk. Patients at intermediate bleeding risk with an albumin under 2 g/dl have a moderately favorable benefit-to-risk ratio (under 5:1). Patients at high bleeding risk are unlikely to benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation regardless of albuminemia. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, to account for uncertainty in risk estimates, confirmed these trends. From these data, we constructed a tool to estimate the likelihood of benefit based on an individual's bleeding risk profile, serum albumin level, and acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio (www.gntools.com). This tool provides an approach to the decision of prophylactic anticoagulation personalized to the individual's needs and adaptable to dynamic changes in health status and risk profile.
原发性膜性肾病与静脉血栓栓塞事件风险增加相关,而静脉血栓栓塞事件与血清白蛋白水平呈负相关。为了评估预防性抗凝的潜在益处(预防静脉血栓栓塞事件)相对于风险(严重出血),我们构建了一个马尔可夫决策模型。根据血清白蛋白得出的静脉血栓栓塞事件风险来自于一个由898例原发性膜性肾病患者组成的起始队列。出血风险估计值来自系统的文献综述。根据出血风险和血清白蛋白预测获益风险比。在低出血风险患者中,随着低白蛋白血症的加重,该比值从白蛋白低于3g/dl时的4.5:1增加到白蛋白低于2g/dl时的13.1:1。中度出血风险且白蛋白低于2g/dl的患者具有中等有利的获益风险比(低于5:1)。高出血风险患者无论白蛋白水平如何,都不太可能从预防性抗凝中获益。考虑到风险估计中的不确定性的概率敏感性分析证实了这些趋势。基于这些数据,我们构建了一个工具,用于根据个体的出血风险概况、血清白蛋白水平和可接受的获益风险比来估计获益可能性(www.gntools.com)。该工具提供了一种根据个体需求进行预防性抗凝决策的方法,并且能够适应健康状况和风险概况的动态变化。