From the *Respiratory Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, †Institute for Child Health, London, United Kingdom; and ‡International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Jan;33 Suppl 2(Suppl 2 Optimum Dosing of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine For Infants 0 A Landscape Analysis of Evidence Supportin g Different Schedules):S172-81. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000076.
Since second generation pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) targeting 10 and 13 serotypes became available in 2010, the number of national policy makers considering these vaccines has steadily increased. An important consideration for a national immunization program is the timing and number of doses-the schedule-that will best prevent disease in the population. Data on disease epidemiology and the efficacy or effectiveness of PCV schedules are typically considered when choosing a schedule. Practical concerns, such as the existing vaccine schedule, and vaccine program performance are also important. In low-income countries, pneumococcal disease and deaths typically peak well before the end of the first year of life, making a schedule that provides PCV doses early in life (eg, a 6-, 10- and 14-week schedule) potentially the best option. In other settings, a schedule including a booster dose may address disease that peaks in the second year of life or may be seen to enhance a schedule already in place. A large and growing body of evidence from immunogenicity studies, as well as clinical trials and observational studies of carriage, pneumonia and invasive disease, has been systematically reviewed; these data indicate that schedules of 3 or 4 doses all work well, and that the differences between these regimens are subtle, especially in a mature program in which coverage is high and indirect (herd) effects help enhance protection provided directly by a vaccine schedule. The recent World Health Organization policy statement on PCVs endorsed a schedule of 3 primary doses without a booster or, as a new alternative, 2 primary doses with a booster dose. While 1 schedule may be preferred in a particular setting based on local epidemiology or practical considerations, achieving high coverage with 3 doses is likely more important than the specific timing of doses.
自 2010 年针对 10 型和 13 型的第二代肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV)问世以来,考虑使用这些疫苗的国家政策制定者数量稳步增加。国家免疫规划的一个重要考虑因素是预防人群疾病的最佳时间和剂量数——即时间表。在选择时间表时,通常会考虑疾病流行病学数据以及 PCV 时间表的疗效或有效性。实际问题,例如现有的疫苗时间表以及疫苗规划的执行情况也很重要。在低收入国家,肺炎球菌疾病和死亡通常在生命的第一年结束前达到高峰,因此尽早(例如,6 周、10 周和 14 周)提供 PCV 剂量的时间表可能是最佳选择。在其他环境中,包括加强剂量的时间表可能会解决第二年发生的疾病高峰问题,或者可能被认为可以增强已有的时间表。大量且不断增加的免疫原性研究、临床试验和针对带菌状态、肺炎和侵袭性疾病的观察性研究证据已经得到系统审查;这些数据表明,3 剂或 4 剂方案均有效,并且这些方案之间的差异很小,尤其是在高覆盖率和间接(群体)效应有助于增强疫苗接种计划直接提供的保护的成熟计划中。最近世界卫生组织关于 PCV 的政策声明支持 3 剂基础免疫而不加强或 2 剂基础免疫加 1 剂加强免疫的方案。虽然基于当地流行病学或实际考虑因素,一种方案可能在特定环境中更受欢迎,但实现高覆盖率的 3 剂接种可能比剂量的具体时间更重要。