Yaffe Mark, Luo Michael, Goyal Nitin, Chan Philip, Patel Anay, Cayo Max, Stulberg S David
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 North Saint Clair, Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Sep;9(5):837-44. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0968-6. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS), and manual instruments at short-term follow-up.
122 TKAs were performed by a single surgeon: 42 with PSI, 38 with CAS, and 40 with manual instrumentation. Preoperative, 1-month, and 6-month clinical and functional outcomes were measured using the Knee Society scoring system (knee score, function score, range of motion, and pain score). Improvements in clinical and functional outcomes from the preoperative to postoperative period were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were measured to evaluate limb and component alignment.
Preoperative, 1-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative knee scores, function scores, range of motion, and pain scores were highest in the PSI group compared to CAS and manual instrumentation. At 6-month follow-up, PSI TKA was associated with a statistically significant improvement in functional score when compared to manual TKA. Otherwise, there were no statistically significant differences in improvements among PSI, CAS, and manual TKA groups.
The higher preoperative scores in the PSI group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions from the raw postoperative scores, but analyzing the changes in scores revealed that PSI was associated with a statistically significant improvement in Knee Society Functional score at 6-month post-TKA as compared to CAS or manual TKA. This may be attributable to improvements in component rotation and positioning, improved component size accuracy, or other factors that are not discernible on plain radiograph.
本研究旨在评估在短期随访中,采用患者特异性器械(PSI)、计算机辅助手术(CAS)和手动器械进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的临床、功能和影像学结果。
由一名外科医生实施122例TKA手术:42例采用PSI,38例采用CAS,40例采用手动器械。使用膝关节协会评分系统(膝关节评分、功能评分、活动范围和疼痛评分)测量术前、术后1个月和6个月的临床和功能结果。分析术前至术后临床和功能结果的改善情况。测量术前和术后X线片以评估肢体和假体对线情况。
与CAS和手动器械组相比,PSI组术前、术后1个月和术后6个月的膝关节评分、功能评分、活动范围和疼痛评分最高。在6个月随访时,与手动TKA相比,PSI TKA在功能评分方面有统计学意义的显著改善。否则,PSI、CAS和手动TKA组之间在改善情况上没有统计学意义的差异。
PSI组术前评分较高限制了从原始术后评分得出明确结论的能力,但分析评分变化显示,与CAS或手动TKA相比,PSI在TKA术后6个月时膝关节协会功能评分有统计学意义的显著改善。这可能归因于假体旋转和定位的改善、假体尺寸准确性的提高或普通X线片上无法辨别的其他因素。