Suppr超能文献

基于调查的瑞士医院计算机化医嘱录入中临床决策支持系统的清单。

A survey-based inventory of clinical decision support systems in computerised provider order entry in Swiss hospitals.

机构信息

Geneva University Hospitals, SWITZERLAND;

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Dec 13;143:w13894. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13894. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY

Computerised order entry and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are considered to be important strategies to safeguard drug treatment. Although their dissemination is nationally enforced in Switzerland, current implementation rates vary. Moreover, types and implementation modes of CDSSs can differ substantially. This study maps the implementation of computerised order entry and CDSSs in Switzerland.

METHODS

In February 2011, a survey exploring the implementation of computerised order entry and types of CDSS was sent via e-mail to all public hospitals (n = 120) and private clinics (n = 165) registered at the Swiss Hospitals Federation (H+). Nonresponders were reminded three times to complete the survey. Data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

One-third of all hospitals and clinics respon-ded to the survey (n = 92/285; 32.3%), with 73 institutions agreeing to participate. Of these 73 institutions, 29 prescribed electronically and 13 planned to implement electronic prescribing. Implementation of CDSSs was less frequent, with 14 institutions actually using CDSSs (19.1%) and another 18 institutions planning the implementation (24.6%). The type of CDSS most frequently implemented was information on hospital formularies (n = 13) and drug-drug interactions (n = 11), but CDSSs with regard to genotype, drug interactions with laboratory test results, contraindications, specific age groups and necessary drug orders were only rarely implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

Although implementation of computerised order entry in Switzerland is increasing, the types and magnitude of CDSSs vary largely and mainly focus on basic decision support.

摘要

研究问题

计算机医嘱录入和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)被认为是保障药物治疗的重要策略。尽管它们在瑞士全国范围内被强制实施,但目前的实施率存在差异。此外,CDSS 的类型和实施模式可能有很大的不同。本研究旨在绘制瑞士计算机医嘱录入和 CDSS 的实施情况。

方法

2011 年 2 月,通过电子邮件向瑞士医院联合会(H+)注册的所有公立医院(n=120)和私人诊所(n=165)发送了一项调查,以了解计算机医嘱录入和 CDSS 类型的实施情况。未回复的机构被提醒了三次以完成调查。数据采用描述性方法进行分析。

结果

285 家医院和诊所中有 92 家(32.3%)回应了调查,73 家机构同意参与。在这 73 家机构中,有 29 家机构采用电子处方,13 家机构计划实施电子处方。CDSS 的实施频率较低,有 14 家机构(19.1%)实际使用 CDSS,另有 18 家机构(24.6%)计划实施 CDSS。实施最频繁的 CDSS 类型是医院处方集信息(n=13)和药物相互作用信息(n=11),但关于基因型、药物与实验室检查结果的相互作用、禁忌症、特定年龄组和必要药物医嘱的 CDSS 则很少实施。

结论

尽管瑞士计算机医嘱录入的实施正在增加,但 CDSS 的类型和规模差异很大,主要侧重于基本的决策支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验