Internal Medicine and Cardiology Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States.
Cardiol J. 2013;20(6):662-4. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0167.
The variability of blood pressure (BP) makes any single measurement a poor indicator of a patient's true BP. Multiple studies have confirmed the superiority of ambulatory BP measurements over clinic BP measurements in predicting cardiovascular risk; however, this method presents the problem of patient acceptance as it causes frequent arm discomfort and sleep disturbance. We hypothesized that 6 h of daytime BP measurements would result in slightly higher BP readings, yet reveal similar clinical decision making when compared to 24 h of BP measurements.
The source for writing this article was a retrospective analysis of 30 patients who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring. Data obtained included: age, sex, ethnicity, baseline medical problems, medications, laboratory values, reason given for ordering 24-h ambulatory BP measurements, ambulatory BP measurements, and a subsequent decision to change medication.
The average BP of the 24-h measurements was 127/75 mm Hg and the average BP of the 6-h daytime measurements was 131/79 mm Hg (SD 15, p = 0.009). Twenty-six out of 30 patients were at goal or pre-hypertensive. Two out of 30 patients had stage 1 hypertension and 2 out of 30 patients had stage 2 hypertension. Thirteen out of 30 patients had nocturnal dipping. Twelve out of 30 patients had a change in medication, but those changes were not associated with the presence or absence of nocturnal dipping (p = 0.5) or other factors beyond mean BP.
Although there was a statistically significant, 4 mm Hg systolic difference between 24-h and 6-h average BP readings, there was no evidence that this difference led to changes in clinical management. The presence or absence of nocturnal dipping was not associated with a change in medication. We conclude that 6-h daytime ambulatory BP measurements provide sufficient information to guide clinical decision making without the problems of patient acceptance, arm discomfort, and sleep disturbance associated with 24-h BP measurements.
血压(BP)的变异性使得任何单次测量都不能很好地反映患者的真实 BP。多项研究证实,与诊所 BP 测量相比,动态 BP 测量在预测心血管风险方面具有优势;然而,这种方法存在患者接受度的问题,因为它会导致频繁的手臂不适和睡眠干扰。我们假设与 24 小时 BP 测量相比,白天 6 小时的 BP 测量会导致稍高的 BP 读数,但在临床决策方面显示出相似的结果。
本研究的资料来源于 30 例行动态血压监测的患者的回顾性分析。获得的数据包括:年龄、性别、种族、基线医疗问题、药物、实验室值、进行 24 小时动态血压监测的原因、动态血压监测以及随后改变药物的决定。
24 小时测量的平均 BP 为 127/75mmHg,6 小时白天测量的平均 BP 为 131/79mmHg(SD 15,p=0.009)。30 例患者中有 26 例达到目标或处于高血压前期。30 例患者中有 2 例患有 1 期高血压,30 例患者中有 2 例患有 2 期高血压。30 例患者中有 13 例有夜间血压下降。30 例患者中有 12 例改变了药物治疗,但这些变化与夜间血压下降(p=0.5)或平均 BP 以外的其他因素无关。
尽管 24 小时和 6 小时平均 BP 读数之间存在统计学上显著的 4mmHg 收缩压差异,但没有证据表明这一差异导致临床管理的改变。夜间血压下降的存在与否与药物治疗的改变无关。我们的结论是,6 小时白天动态血压测量提供了足够的信息来指导临床决策,而没有与 24 小时 BP 测量相关的患者接受度、手臂不适和睡眠干扰问题。