• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前现代犹太社会中与医疗相关的生物伦理困境,作为引发当前伦理问题的一个切入点。

Bio-ethical dilemmas related to medical treatment in pre-modern Jewish society, as a portal for raising current ethical issues.

作者信息

Mack Tamar Salmon, Shaham Dorith, Marcus Esther-Lee

机构信息

Adam U'Refua Track, The Hadassah-Hebrew University, Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Med Law. 2013 Sep;32(3):287-303.

PMID:24340482
Abstract

Real-life ethical issues that concern those engaged in medical practice existed and were discussed in earlier ages. It seems that many of the same dilemmas that we face today occupied our ancestors as well. An investigation of historical sources may be useful in showing earlier methods of coping with the dilemmas relating to health and illness. In this article we will present several such topics taken from the sources of Jewish society in pre-modern Europe. These sources served as the basis for a course given to medical students as part of the Medical Humanities track. The "raw materials" are historical, written Hebrew and Yiddish sources from Jewish society. Genres include Minute books, the huge corpus of Responsa, historical elegies written about epidemics, memoirs, and instruction books written by Jewish physicians. Profound bio-ethical issues can be found in historical sources. Main issues discussed are: physician's fees, obligations, and rights; personal characteristics expected of physicians; physician's obligations when his/her own life is endangered; medicalization of certain human conditions; and ideological questions regarding the relationship between traditional folk medicine and modern, academic medicine. The historical distance facilitates a freer discussion about distant people, while getting in touch with our own attitudes.

摘要

涉及医疗从业者的现实伦理问题在早期就已存在并被讨论。似乎我们如今面临的许多困境也曾困扰着我们的祖先。对历史资料的研究可能有助于展现早期应对与健康和疾病相关困境的方法。在本文中,我们将呈现几个取自前现代欧洲犹太社会资料的此类主题。这些资料是作为医学人文课程的一部分提供给医学生的一门课程的基础。“原材料”是来自犹太社会的历史希伯来文和意第绪文资料。体裁包括会议记录簿、大量的问答集、关于流行病的历史挽歌、回忆录以及犹太医生撰写的指导手册。在历史资料中能发现深刻的生物伦理问题。讨论的主要问题有:医生的费用、义务和权利;对医生个人特质的期望;当医生自身生命受到威胁时的义务;某些人类状况的医学化;以及关于传统民间医学与现代学术医学关系的意识形态问题。历史的距离有助于更自由地讨论遥远的人们,同时也能让我们审视自己的态度。

相似文献

1
Bio-ethical dilemmas related to medical treatment in pre-modern Jewish society, as a portal for raising current ethical issues.前现代犹太社会中与医疗相关的生物伦理困境,作为引发当前伦理问题的一个切入点。
Med Law. 2013 Sep;32(3):287-303.
2
[Medicine, physicians and medical ethics in Jewish tradition through the ages].
Harefuah. 2014 Aug;153(8):489-92, 496.
3
The care of patients with dementia: a modern Jewish ethical perspective.痴呆症患者的护理:现代犹太伦理视角
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 May;53(5):881-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53271.x.
4
The traditionalist Jewish physician and modern biomedical ethical problems.传统犹太医生与现代生物医学伦理问题。
J Med Philos. 1983 Aug;8(3):225-41. doi: 10.1093/jmp/8.3.225.
5
The physician charter on medical professionalism: a Jewish ethical perspective.《医学职业精神医师宪章:犹太伦理视角》
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jul;31(7):404-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009423.
6
Jewish tradition and the right to health care.犹太传统与医疗保健权。
Reconstructionist. 1984 Apr-May;49(6):15-20.
7
Medical confidentiality and patient privacy: the Jewish perspective.医疗保密与患者隐私:犹太视角
Cancer Invest. 2006 Feb;24(1):113-5. doi: 10.1080/07357900500449660.
8
[Complementary medicine--Jewish medical ethics].[补充医学——犹太医学伦理]
Harefuah. 2011 Aug;150(8):672-5, 686.
9
[Self endangerment to save life--competing Jewish legal and moral obligations].
Harefuah. 2014 Nov;153(11):638-40, 688.
10
A historical overview of the developing medical ethics culture in the new Jewish settlement in Israel during the years 1840-1914.1840年至1914年间以色列新犹太定居点医学伦理文化发展的历史概述。
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2003 Mar;13(2):51-3.