Suppr超能文献

宗教原教旨主义者对禁忌图像和言语的反应。

Reactions of religious fundamentalists to taboo images and words.

作者信息

Bates Larry W, Hudiburg Richard A, Lauderdale Elizabeth P, Castillo Joseph R

机构信息

University of North Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2013 Aug;113(1):1085-108. doi: 10.2466/17.07.pr0.113x15z2.

Abstract

Some view religious fundamentalism as inclusive of fear of the world as a dangerous place. Fundamentalists are known to have extensive taboo lists, but research concerning their reactions to taboo stimuli is sparse. If fear is a basic component of fundamentalism, then reactions to taboo stimuli should be somewhat similar to common fear reactions, including subjective appraisal of discomfort, psychophysiological arousal, cognitive interference, and behavioral avoidance. The current research addressed some of these questions with three studies to examine subjective discomfort to religiously-taboo and religiously-neutral words and photographs (N = 160), physiological arousal to these same photographs (N = 129), and attentional bias on a modified Stroop test of these same words (N = 182). Although subjective appraisals of discomfort to taboo words and photographs among fundamentalists were confirmed, this research did not find that physiological responses or cognitive interference to taboo stimuli were elevated in those scoring high in religious fundamentalism.

摘要

一些人认为宗教原教旨主义包含对世界是一个危险之地的恐惧。众所周知,原教旨主义者有大量的禁忌清单,但关于他们对禁忌刺激反应的研究却很少。如果恐惧是原教旨主义的一个基本组成部分,那么对禁忌刺激的反应应该与常见的恐惧反应有些相似,包括对不适感的主观评估、心理生理唤醒、认知干扰和行为回避。当前的研究通过三项研究探讨了其中一些问题,以检验对宗教禁忌和宗教中立的词语及照片的主观不适感(N = 160)、对这些相同照片的生理唤醒(N = 129)以及对这些相同词语的改良斯特鲁普测试中的注意偏向(N = 182)。尽管原教旨主义者对禁忌词语和照片的不适感主观评估得到了证实,但这项研究并未发现宗教原教旨主义得分高的人对禁忌刺激的生理反应或认知干扰有所增强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验