• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[冠状动脉血管成形术患者不适与焦虑的评估]

[The evaluation of discomfort and anxiety in the patient undergoing coronary angioplasty].

作者信息

Poliwczak Adam Rafal, Funt Danuta, Broncel Marlena

机构信息

Department of internal Diseases and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Gierz Cardiology Center, MED-PRO, Poland.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Oct;35(208):202-4.

PMID:24340889
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Coronary heart disease is now the leading cause of death in the world and in Poland. Every year, the acute coronary syndromes (ACS) falls over a hundred thousand people, of whom the vast majority are treated invasively. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) carries a possible complication. The possibility of their occurrence is one of the reasons to feel fear and discomfort prior to the study.

THE AIM OF STUDY

Was to assess of the level of discomfort and anxiety experienced by those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 100 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS or stable angina. The research method used in the survey was a questionnaire form, includes a total of 23 questions. The survey was carried out 24 hours after the execution diagnostic procedure or therapy.

RESULTS

PCI was performed significantly more often with radial access--65%, than femoral--35%. People undergo PCI in 77% had knowledge of it. The main source of information was the hospital staff (48%), GPs (20%) and to a lesser extent, the Internet (16%) and friends (12%). To assess the discomfort uses a linear scale of points. Depending on the vascular access was obtained an average of 5.7 points for radial access and 8.8 points for femoral access, corresponding to moderate and very large intensity of discomfort. The degree of discomfort was lower (42%) or compatible (27%) of the representations before the treatments. The intensity of the perceived fear determined the 53% of the very large, and 21% as large. On average, a 10-point scale, respondents have identified him at 7.9 points. Significantly negatively correlated on the level of education (r = -0.421, P < 0.05) and with the degree of knowledge of the declared procedure (r = -0.519, P < 0.01) and positively correlated with the intensity of reported discomfort (r = 0.497 p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing discomfort and anxiety in patients undergoing PCI is very important. This affects the success of the procedure and for appropriate treatment and rehabilitation. Active detection of factors affecting these phenomena and their reduction should be one of the tasks of the personnel involved in the treatment. It is necessary to proper education, including get familiar with the methods of endovascular interventions.

摘要

未标注

冠心病目前是全球及波兰的首要死因。每年,急性冠脉综合征(ACS)致使超过十万人患病,其中绝大多数接受侵入性治疗。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)存在可能的并发症。其发生的可能性是患者在检查前感到恐惧和不适的原因之一。

研究目的

评估接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的不适程度和焦虑水平。

材料与方法

该研究纳入了100例因ACS或稳定型心绞痛接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的连续患者。调查采用的研究方法为问卷形式,共包含23个问题。调查在执行诊断程序或治疗24小时后进行。

结果

经桡动脉途径进行PCI的比例显著高于经股动脉途径,分别为65%和35%。77%接受PCI的患者了解该治疗方法。主要信息来源是医院工作人员(48%)、全科医生(20%),其次是互联网(16%)和朋友(12%)。采用线性评分量表评估不适程度。根据血管入路情况,经桡动脉途径的平均评分为5.7分,经股动脉途径为8.8分,分别对应中度和非常强烈的不适程度。治疗前预期的不适程度较低(42%)或相当(27%)。感知到的恐惧强度为非常强烈的占53%,强烈的占21%。平均而言,在10分制量表上,受访者将其评为7.9分。恐惧水平与教育程度显著负相关(r = -0.421,P < 0.05),与所声明治疗程序的了解程度显著负相关(r = -0.519,P < 0.01),与报告的不适强度显著正相关(r = 0.497,P < 0.05)。

结论

减轻接受PCI患者的不适和焦虑非常重要。这影响到治疗程序的成功以及适当的治疗和康复。积极检测影响这些现象的因素并加以减少应是参与治疗的人员的任务之一。进行适当的教育很有必要,包括熟悉血管内介入治疗方法。

相似文献

1
[The evaluation of discomfort and anxiety in the patient undergoing coronary angioplasty].[冠状动脉血管成形术患者不适与焦虑的评估]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Oct;35(208):202-4.
2
Predictors of hospital mortality in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes and stable angina.老年患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠脉综合征和稳定型心绞痛的住院死亡率预测因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Sep 1;151(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
3
Do differences in repeat revascularization explain the antianginal benefits of bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention?: implications for future treatment comparisons.再次血运重建的差异是否解释了搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比的抗心绞痛益处?对未来治疗比较的启示。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):267-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964585. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
4
Anxiety in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的焦虑。
Heart Lung. 2011 May-Jun;40(3):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.05.054. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
5
Different prognostic importance of elevated troponin I after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris.急性冠状动脉综合征和稳定型心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后肌钙蛋白I升高的不同预后意义。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2008 Jun;42(3):214-21. doi: 10.1080/14017430801932824.
6
Effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream tirofiban on myocardial damage and 180-day clinical outcomes in high-risk acute coronary syndromes patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.替罗非班上游治疗与下游治疗对高危急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心肌损伤及 180 天临床结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 5;122(15):1732-7.
7
Recent changes in practice of elective percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina.稳定型心绞痛择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗实践的近期变化。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 May;4(3):300-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957175. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
8
Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS). Characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Poland.波兰急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(PL-ACS)。波兰急性冠状动脉综合征患者的特征、治疗及预后。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Aug;65(8):861-72; discussion 873-4.
9
Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease.患者和心脏病专家对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗稳定型冠心病的获益的看法。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Sep 7;153(5):307-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00005.
10
[The impact of prior revascularization procedures on outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS].[既往血运重建术对急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局的影响]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2011 Jan;30(175):10-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Water on Fire: The Patients' Lived Experience of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.火上之水:患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的真实体验
J Patient Exp. 2020 Aug;7(4):493-498. doi: 10.1177/2374373519850971. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
2
The Personality and Psychological Stress Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Five Years.人格与心理压力可预测冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗五年后的主要不良心血管事件。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(15):e3364. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003364.