Department of Psychology, University of Utah.
J Pers Disord. 2014 Feb;28(1):113-20. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2014.28.1.113.
This commentary places the article by Feenstra and colleagues (in press) within the frameworks and findings of normative identity development research. Points of overlap between the way identity is conceptualized by Feenstra and colleagues and the way identity is conceptualized in normative work are outlined. In addition, areas where juxtaposing psychopathology and normative developmental findings could yield new insights for researchers working in both areas are briefly highlighted.
本评论将 Feenstra 及其同事的文章(即将发表)置于规范身份发展研究的框架和研究结果之中。概述了 Feenstra 及其同事对身份的概念化方式与规范工作中对身份的概念化方式之间的重叠之处。此外,简要强调了将精神病理学和规范发展研究结果并置的一些领域,这可能为两个领域的研究人员提供新的见解。