Leipzig University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):938-54. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00547. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
Performing a task across the left and right visual hemifields results in better performance than in a within-hemifield version of the task, termed the different-hemifield advantage. Although recent studies used transient stimuli that were presented with long ISIs, here we used a continuous objective electrophysiological (EEG) measure of competitive interactions for attentional processing resources in early visual cortex, the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP). We frequency-tagged locations in each visual quadrant and at central fixation by flickering light-emitting diodes (LEDs) at different frequencies to elicit distinguishable SSVEPs. Stimuli were presented for several seconds, and participants were cued to attend to two LEDs either in one (Within) or distributed across left and right visual hemifields (Across). In addition, we introduced two reference measures: one for suppressive interactions between the peripheral LEDs by using a task at fixation where attention was withdrawn from the periphery and another estimating the upper bound of SSVEP amplitude by cueing participants to attend to only one of the peripheral LEDs. We found significantly greater SSVEP amplitude modulations in Across compared with Within hemifield conditions. No differences were found between SSVEP amplitudes elicited by the peripheral LEDs when participants attended to the centrally located LEDs compared with when peripheral LEDs had to be ignored in Across and Within trials. Attending to only one LED elicited the same SSVEP amplitude as Across conditions. Although behavioral data displayed a more complex pattern, SSVEP amplitudes were well in line with the predictions of the different-hemifield advantage account during sustained visuospatial attention.
在左、右视野中执行任务比在视野内执行任务表现更好,这种优势被称为“不同视野优势”。虽然最近的研究使用了长 ISI 呈现的瞬态刺激,但我们使用了一种连续的客观电生理(EEG)测量方法,来测量早期视觉皮层注意力处理资源的竞争相互作用,即稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)。我们通过闪烁的发光二极管(LED)以不同频率标记每个视觉象限和中央注视点的位置,以产生可区分的 SSVEP。刺激呈现数秒,参与者被提示注意两个 LED,要么在一个视野(视野内),要么分布在左、右视野(跨视野)。此外,我们引入了两个参考测量:一个用于通过在注视点上进行任务来测量来自外周 LED 的抑制性相互作用,另一个通过提示参与者只注意外周 LED 之一来估计 SSVEP 振幅的上限。我们发现,与视野内条件相比,跨视野条件下 SSVEP 振幅调制显著更大。当参与者注意中央位于 LED 时,与跨视野和视野内试验中必须忽略外周 LED 时相比,外周 LED 诱发的 SSVEP 振幅没有差异。只注意一个 LED 会产生与跨视野条件相同的 SSVEP 振幅。尽管行为数据显示出更复杂的模式,但 SSVEP 振幅与持续视觉空间注意力的不同视野优势解释预测相符。