Zhong Li, Tong Shi-Fei, Zhang Qian, Zhang Zhi-Hui, Yao Qing, Li Yong-Hua, Zhang Wei-Hua, Song Zhi-Yuan
Department of Cardiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec 1;84(7):1184-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25323. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transcatheter closure (TCC) in patients with ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (RSVA).
RSVA is a rare cardiovascular disease with a varied clinical presentation. The clinical efficacy and safety of TCC for RSVA still remain an ongoing concern.
From January 2009 to March 2013, 22 patients with RSVA were selected for TCC. Intracardiac pressure and size of cardiac chamber were measured before and post TCC. All patients were followed up by transthoracic echocardiography at 1, 3, 6, 12 months after procedure.
RSVA was successfully occluded in 20 patients (19 cases with Amplatzer duct occluder and one with muscular ventricular septal defect occluder). Aortic root angiography showed no shunt in 18 cases and a small residual shunt in two cases. The pressures in the right atrium, right ventricle, and pulmonary artery were significantly decreased after the procedure (P < 0.01), and the aortic pressure was elevated (P < 0.001). The internal diameters of the right atrium, left atrium, and left ventricle were also significantly declined after the procedure (P < 0.05). No complications were found after 18.5 ± 6.5 (range 3-35) months follow-up. Two patients underwent acute surgical aortic valve replacement because of procedure-related aortic valve regurgitation.
Our results indicate that TCC is a promising alternative therapy to surgery in appropriate patients with RSVA. However, rare but severe procedure-related complications should be considered in the risk assessment.
评估经导管封堵术(TCC)治疗瓦氏窦瘤破裂(RSVA)患者的临床疗效和安全性。
RSVA是一种临床表现多样的罕见心血管疾病。TCC治疗RSVA的临床疗效和安全性仍是一个持续关注的问题。
选取2009年1月至2013年3月期间22例RSVA患者进行TCC治疗。在TCC前后测量心内压力和心腔大小。所有患者在术后1、3、6、12个月接受经胸超声心动图随访。
20例患者RSVA成功封堵(19例使用Amplatzer导管封堵器,1例使用肌部室间隔缺损封堵器)。主动脉根部血管造影显示18例无分流,2例有少量残余分流。术后右心房、右心室和肺动脉压力显著降低(P < 0.01),主动脉压力升高(P < 0.001)。术后右心房、左心房和左心室内径也显著减小(P < 0.05)。在18.5 ± 6.5(范围3 - 35)个月的随访中未发现并发症。2例患者因与手术相关的主动脉瓣反流接受了急诊外科主动脉瓣置换术。
我们的结果表明,对于合适的RSVA患者,TCC是一种有前景的替代手术治疗方法。然而,在风险评估中应考虑罕见但严重的与手术相关的并发症。