Yazdani Javad, Taheri Talesh Kourosh, Kalantar Motamedi Mohammad Hosein, Khorshidi Reza, Fekri Sasan, Hajmohammadi Saeed
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.
Trauma Mon. 2013 Spring;18(1):17-20. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.9865. Epub 2013 May 26.
Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial.
The present study assessed the postoperative complications and outcomes associated with the fixation of mandibular angle fractures using 1 and 2 miniplates in patients with favorable mandibular angle fractures.
A prospective study of 87 patients (73 males, 14 females) with favorable mandibular angle fractures was done. In the first group, a 4-hole miniplate was placed at the superior border through an intraoral approach. In group 2, patients were treated with 2 miniplates, one placed at the superior border (similar to group 1) and the other on the lateral aspect of the angle at the inferior border through an intraoral and transcutaneous approach using a trocar. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, malunion and sensory disturbances associated with surgery, additional maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) by means of an arch bar and wires for a longer period (for delayed union) and infection were assessed in patients of both groups up to 12 months postoperatively. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test.
In the single miniplate group, 25 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (55.6%), 22 patients required additional use of MMF (48.9%) and 3 patients developed infections (6.7%). In the double miniplate group 20 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (47.6%), 18 patients required additional use of MMF (42.9%) and 1 patient developed infection (2.4%). None of the patients in either group showed malocclusion or malunion. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding overall complication rate.
In this study, use of one miniplate or two miniplates for treatment of favorable mandibular angle fractures was associated with a similar incidence of complications. Thus, it seems that the use of two miniplates in this setting may not be warranted, nor cost-efficient.
单皮质微型钢板固定是下颌角骨折内固定的一种公认且可靠的方法。虽然理论上放置第二块微型钢板可能会提供更高的稳定性;然而,这个问题的临床重要性仍存在争议。
本研究评估了在下颌角骨折情况良好的患者中使用一块和两块微型钢板固定下颌角骨折后的术后并发症及结果。
对87例下颌角骨折情况良好的患者(73例男性,14例女性)进行了一项前瞻性研究。第一组通过口内入路在上颌骨边缘放置一块4孔微型钢板。在第二组中,患者接受两块微型钢板治疗,一块放置在上颌骨边缘(与第一组类似),另一块通过使用套管针经口内和经皮入路放置在角部外侧的下颌骨边缘。对两组患者术后长达12个月的术后并发症进行评估,包括错牙合、骨不连以及与手术相关的感觉障碍、因延迟愈合而通过牙弓夹板和钢丝进行更长时间的额外颌间固定(MMF)以及感染。使用卡方检验对数据进行分析。
在单微型钢板组中,25例患者出现与手术相关的唇部麻木(55.6%),22例患者需要额外使用MMF(48.9%),3例患者发生感染(6.7%)。在双微型钢板组中,20例患者出现与手术相关的唇部麻木(47.6%),18例患者需要额外使用MMF(42.9%),1例患者发生感染(2.4%)。两组患者均未出现错牙合或骨不连。两组在总体并发症发生率方面未观察到显著差异。
在本研究中,使用一块或两块微型钢板治疗下颌角骨折情况良好的患者,并发症发生率相似。因此,在这种情况下使用两块微型钢板似乎没有必要,也不具有成本效益。