Sabeen Mujeeb, Dept. of Paediatric Surgery, National Institute of Child Health, Rafiquee Shaheed Road, Karachi-75510, Pakistan.
Jamshed Akhtar, Dept. of Paediatric Surgery, National Institute of Child Health, Rafiquee Shaheed Road, Karachi-75510, Pakistan.`
Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Jan;29(1):27-30. doi: 10.12669/pjms.291.2944.
Circumcision is a commonly performed surgical procedure but choice of anesthesia remained an issue of research and debate. This study was conducted to find out the effectiveness of the eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream with dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) using lignocaine, for reduction of pain during circumcision.
This was comparative study carried out in Surgical Unit B of National Institute of Child Health Karachi, from May 2008 to October 2008. Patients under six month of age were randomized in to two groups (EMLA and DPNB) of fifty patients each. The effectiveness of pain control was assessed by measuring the baseline heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and Neonatal infant Pain Scale (NIPS scale) before the start of procedure and measuring of these parameters for each step of circumcision. Independent sample t -test was used to compare means and repeated ANOVA was used to compare means of HR, RR, oxygen (O2) saturations and NIPS.
The mean age in both the groups was 2.3 months. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline parameters in both the groups except the respiratory rate, which was significantly raised in DPNB group (33 breaths/min in EMLA and 38 in DPNB P < 0.04). During circumcision there was significant increase in heart rate in DPNB group, especially in step three and step four (p < 0.04). Oxygen saturation dropped in both the groups (baseline saturation 98% up to 91% in step 4). While assessing NIPS scores in both the groups, statistically significant difference was found between NIPS at step two and step four in two groups (p < 0.04).
The overall pain control was equal in both the groups, although NIPS score was higher in DPNB in step two and four of circumcision. There was difference in application and cost. EMLA was easy to apply but has increased cost; while DPNB required expertise.
割礼是一种常见的外科手术,但麻醉选择仍然是一个研究和争论的问题。本研究旨在探讨使用利多卡因的局麻药混合物(EMLA)乳膏联合阴茎背神经阻滞(DPNB)在减轻割礼疼痛方面的效果。
这是 2008 年 5 月至 2008 年 10 月在卡拉奇国家儿童健康研究所外科 B 区进行的一项比较研究。将 6 个月以下的患者随机分为 EMLA 和 DPNB 两组,每组 50 例。通过测量手术开始前的基础心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)和新生儿疼痛量表(NIPS 量表),以及测量割礼每一步的这些参数,评估疼痛控制的效果。采用独立样本 t 检验比较均值,采用重复方差分析比较 HR、RR、氧(O2)饱和度和 NIPS 的均值。
两组的平均年龄均为 2.3 个月。两组的基础参数无统计学差异,除 DPNB 组呼吸频率明显升高(EMLA 组为 33 次/分钟,DPNB 组为 38 次/分钟,P<0.04)外。在割礼过程中,DPNB 组的心率显著增加,尤其是在第三步和第四步(p<0.04)。两组的氧饱和度均下降(基础饱和度为 98%,至第四步时降至 91%)。在评估两组的 NIPS 评分时,两组的 NIPS 在第二步和第四步之间存在统计学差异(p<0.04)。
两组的整体疼痛控制效果相当,尽管 DPNB 在割礼的第二步和第四步的 NIPS 评分较高。两者在应用和成本上存在差异。EMLA 易于应用,但成本较高;而 DPNB 需要专业知识。