Suppr超能文献

多排 CT 与心脏磁共振成像比较左心室功能的全球荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of global left ventricular function comparing multidetector computed tomography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.

Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 15;113(4):731-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.016. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

Abstract

We compare the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for evaluating global left ventricular function. We systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and the Web of Science databases for studies published between 1966 to January 2013 that compared left ventricle (LV) volumes, ejection fraction (EF) and LV mass measured by MDCT and CMR. We performed meta-analyses and used random-effects model with inverse variance weighting test to determine the overall bias and limits of agreement of LV end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, and EF measured by MDCT and CMR. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed to compare 16-slice and 64-slice MDCT with CMR. Two study authors independently reviewed the 90 articles originally identified and selected 27 studies (n = 831) for analysis. Excellent correlation and a linear relation were seen between MDCT and CMR for LV end-diastolic volume (r = 0.93; p <0.001), LV end-systolic volume (r = 0.95; p <0.001), LV stroke volume (r = 0.85; p <0.001), LV ejection fraction (r = 0.93; p <0.001), and LV mass (r = 0.86; p <0.001). Subgroup analyses showed strong positive correlations for both 16- and 64-slice MDCT. In conclusion, although not the first-line test for LV function assessment in most patients, when appropriate, retrospectively gated MDCT provides an accurate and valid assessment of LV function compared with CMR.

摘要

我们比较了多层螺旋 CT(MDCT)和心脏磁共振成像(CMR)在评估整体左心室功能方面的诊断准确性。我们系统地检索了 1966 年至 2013 年 1 月发表的比较 MDCT 和 CMR 测量的左心室(LV)容积、射血分数(EF)和 LV 质量的文献,包括 PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane 中心数据库、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库。我们进行了荟萃分析,并使用具有逆方差加权检验的随机效应模型来确定 MDCT 和 CMR 测量的 LV 舒张末期容积、收缩末期容积、心搏量和 EF 的总体偏差和一致性界限。此外,还进行了亚组分析,比较了 16 层和 64 层 MDCT 与 CMR。两位研究作者独立审查了最初确定的 90 篇文章,并选择了 27 项研究(n = 831)进行分析。MDCT 与 CMR 之间的 LV 舒张末期容积(r = 0.93;p <0.001)、LV 收缩末期容积(r = 0.95;p <0.001)、LV 心搏量(r = 0.85;p <0.001)、LV 射血分数(r = 0.93;p <0.001)和 LV 质量(r = 0.86;p <0.001)之间存在极好的相关性和线性关系。亚组分析表明,16 层和 64 层 MDCT 均有强烈的正相关。总之,虽然在大多数患者中不是 LV 功能评估的一线检查,但在适当的情况下,回顾性门控 MDCT 与 CMR 相比提供了准确和有效的 LV 功能评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验