NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Department of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jan;152(1):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.11.033. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
The neurocognitive theory of insight posits that poor insight in psychotic illnesses is related to cognitive deficits in cognitive self-appraisal mechanisms. In this paper we perform a comprehensive meta-analysis examining relationships between clinical insight and neurocognition in psychotic disorders. We have also completed a meta-analysis of studies examining 'cognitive insight', as measured by the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), and its relationship with neurocognitive function in patients with psychosis. The clinical insight analysis included data from 72 studies and a total population of 5429 patients. We found that insight in psychosis was significantly associated with total cognition (r=0.16, p<0.001), IQ (r=0.16, p<0.001), memory (r=0.13, p<0.001) and executive function (r=0.14, p<0.001). All of these correlations were stronger when examined in patients with schizophrenia only. In the BCIS analysis we included 7 studies and 466 patients in total. We found that no significant associations were found between the self-reflectiveness sub-component and neurocognition. By contrast there were significant correlations between the self-certainty subcomponent and memory (r=-0.23, p<0.001), IQ (r=-0.19, p<0.001) and total cognition (r=-0.14, p=0.01). We did not find evidence of significant publication bias in any analyses. Overall, our results indicate that there is a small but significant relationship between clinical insight, some aspects of cognitive insight and neurocognition. These findings reflect the complexity of the insight construct and indicate that while the neurocognitive model is important it is likely to be one of many which contribute to the understanding of this phenomenon.
洞察力的神经认知理论假设,精神疾病中洞察力差与认知自我评估机制的认知缺陷有关。在本文中,我们进行了一项综合的荟萃分析,研究了精神障碍患者的临床洞察力与神经认知之间的关系。我们还完成了一项使用贝克认知洞察力量表(BCIS)衡量的“认知洞察力”的研究的荟萃分析,以及它与精神病患者的神经认知功能之间的关系。临床洞察力分析包括 72 项研究的数据和总共 5429 名患者的总人群。我们发现,精神疾病的洞察力与总认知(r=0.16,p<0.001)、智商(r=0.16,p<0.001)、记忆(r=0.13,p<0.001)和执行功能(r=0.14,p<0.001)显著相关。当仅在精神分裂症患者中进行检查时,所有这些相关性都更强。在 BCIS 分析中,我们总共包括了 7 项研究和 466 名患者。我们发现,自我反思分量表与神经认知之间没有发现显著的关联。相比之下,自我确信分量表与记忆(r=-0.23,p<0.001)、智商(r=-0.19,p<0.001)和总认知(r=-0.14,p=0.01)之间存在显著的相关性。我们没有发现任何分析存在显著的出版偏倚的证据。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,临床洞察力、认知洞察力的某些方面与神经认知之间存在着小而显著的关系。这些发现反映了洞察力结构的复杂性,并表明,尽管神经认知模型很重要,但它可能是许多有助于理解这一现象的模型之一。