Department of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Anat. 2014 Apr;27(3):296-303. doi: 10.1002/ca.22341. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
Eight factors are claimed to have a negative influence on anatomical knowledge of medical students: (1) teaching by nonmedically qualified teachers, (2) the absence of a core anatomy curriculum, (3) decreased use of dissection as a teaching tool, (4) lack of teaching anatomy in context, (5) integrated curricula (problem-based learning or systems-based curricula), (6) inadequate assessment of anatomical knowledge, (7) decreased anatomy teaching time, and (8) neglect of vertical integration of anatomy teaching. A recent review revealed a lack of evidence underpinning any of the claims owing to the poor quality of papers, and recommendations were made for education and research on teaching in context and the implementation of vertical integration and of assessment strategies. In this article, we will describe the alleged factors fully, revealing additional recommendations for improving anatomy education by promoting recognition for teaching in institutions, by enhancing the professional recognition of anatomists through the implementation of a national postgraduate training program, and by encouraging anatomists to participate in educational research.
(1)非医学专业教师授课,(2)缺乏核心解剖学课程,(3)解剖学作为教学工具的使用减少,(4)缺乏上下文相关的解剖学教学,(5)综合课程(基于问题的学习或基于系统的课程),(6)解剖学知识评估不足,(7)解剖学教学时间减少,以及(8)忽视解剖学教学的垂直整合。最近的一项综述显示,由于论文质量较差,没有任何一项主张有充分的证据支持,并就上下文教学的教育和研究以及垂直整合和评估策略的实施提出了建议。在本文中,我们将全面描述这些所谓的因素,并提出通过在机构中促进对教学的认可、通过实施国家研究生培训计划增强解剖学家的专业认可以及鼓励解剖学家参与教育研究来改进解剖学教育的额外建议。