Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Eur Heart J. 2014 Mar;35(9):552-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht530. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
Biomarkers complement clinical assessment and the 12-lead ECG in the diagnosis, risk stratification, triage, and management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). While there is broad consensus that cardiac troponin (cTn) I or T is the preferred biomarker in clinical practice, important uncertainties remain regarding the value of high-sensitivity cTn assays, their best clinical use including the most appropriate timing of serial measurements, as well as the added value of other biomarkers reflecting and quantifying other pathophysiological signals including copeptin and natriuretic peptides. This review will address these aspects with a focus on the diagnostic application of biomarkers, as they are associated with immediate therapeutic consequences. In addition, this review will briefly highlight that increased diagnostic accuracy offered by high-sensitivity cTn assays has contributed to improve our understanding of the incidence, pathophysiology, and mortality of the two distinct components currently summarized under the term ACS: acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina.
生物标志物可补充临床评估和 12 导联心电图在疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的诊断、风险分层、分诊和管理中的作用。虽然广泛认为肌钙蛋白 I 或 T 是临床实践中的首选生物标志物,但在高敏肌钙蛋白检测的价值、其最佳临床应用(包括最适当的连续测量时间)以及反映和量化其他病理生理信号的其他生物标志物的附加值方面仍存在重要不确定性,包括 copeptin 和利钠肽。本综述将重点关注生物标志物的诊断应用,因为它们与即时治疗后果相关,来解决这些方面的问题。此外,本综述还将简要强调,高敏肌钙蛋白检测提供的更高诊断准确性有助于提高我们对目前在 ACS 这一术语下总结的两个不同成分(急性心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛)的发生率、病理生理学和死亡率的理解。