Participation of L3T4 in T cell activation in the absence of class II major histocompatibility complex antigens. Inhibition by anti-L3T4 antibodies is a function both of epitope density and mode of presentation of anti-receptor antibody.

The recognition of many class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-associated antigens by T cells requires the participation of the L3T4 molecule. It has been proposed that this molecule acts to stabilize low affinity binding to antigen in association with MHC and thereby increases the avidity of T cell/antigen interactions. By using antibodies against the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) to activate T cells, thereby circumventing the requirement for antigen presenting cells and MHC-associated antigen, we have been able to study the function of L3T4 in the absence of class II MHC. We have used two monoclonal antibodies, KJ16-133.18 and F23.1, that recognize a determinant encoded by the T cell receptor V beta 8 gene family. These antibodies were used to select two clones of T cells with surface phenotype Thy-1.2+, L3T4+, Lyt-2-, KJ16-133.18+, F23.1+, IA-, IE-. One of these clones (E9.D4) was hapten-specific (anti-ABA + Iak), the other (4.35F2) was alloreactive (anti-Iak). Activation of these clones by antigen, concanavalin A (Con A) or by the F23.1 antibody was studied by assaying the production of interleukin 3 (IL 3). Both soluble and solid phase-coupled F23.1 induced T cell activation in the complete absence of class II MHC, immobilized antibody (either Sepharose-coupled or plastic-adsorbed) being more effective. The induction of IL 3 production by suboptimal doses of either Con A or plastic-adsorbed F23.1 was inhibited by the anti-L3T4 antibody GK1.5, as was the response to F23.1 coupled to Sepharose-4B beads. However, the responses to optimal or superoptimal doses of these stimuli were not inhibited. In contrast, weak responses to non-TCR cross-linking stimuli such as phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) or low concentrations of soluble F23.1 were not inhibited by GK1.5 (the latter response was usually slightly enhanced). These results show that anti-L3T4 antibodies are not inherently inhibitory, but require both ligation and cross-linking of the TCR for their effect. We propose a model whereby L3T4 interacts with the TCR during T cell activation. Anti-L3T4 antibodies sterically hinder the formation of TCR complexes and so prevent activation. However, by increasing the epitope density of the activating ligand, the avidity of the T cell/ligand interaction can be increased sufficiently to prevent this disruption.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)