Villarreal Martha Lissete Morales, Padilha Marina, Vieira Antonio Diogo Silva, Franco Bernadette Dora Gombossy de Melo, Martinez Rafael Chacon Ruiz, Saad Susana Marta Isay
Department of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Department of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 17;8(12):e82102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082102. eCollection 2013.
Species-specific Quantitative Real Time PCR (qPCR) alone and combined with the use of propidium monoazide (PMA) were used along with the plate count method to evaluate the survival of the probiotic strains Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12, and the bacteriocinogenic and potentially probiotic strain Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei 2a in synbiotic (F1) and probiotic (F2) petit-suisse cheeses exposed throughout shelf-life to in vitro simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. The three strains studied showed a reduction in their viability after the 6 h assay. Bb-12 displayed the highest survival capacity, above 72.6 and 74.6% of the initial populations, respectively, by plate count and PMA-qPCR, maintaining population levels in the range or above 6 log CFU/g. The prebiotic mix of inulin and FOS did not offer any additional protection for the strains against the simulated gastrointestinal environment. The microorganisms' populations were comparable among the three methods at the initial time of the assay, confirming the presence of mainly viable and culturable cells. However, with the intensification of the stress induced throughout the various stages of the in vitro test, the differences among the methods increased. The qPCR was not a reliable enumeration method for the quantification of intact bacterial populations, mixed with large numbers of injured and dead bacteria, as confirmed by the scanning electron microscopy results. Furthermore, bacteria plate counts were much lower (P<0.05) than with the PMA-qPCR method, suggesting the accumulation of stressed or dead microorganisms unable to form colonies. The use of PMA overcame the qPCR inability to differentiate between dead and alive cells. The combination of PMA and species-specific qPCR in this study allowed a quick and unequivocal way of enumeration of viable closely related species incorporated into probiotic and synbiotic petit-suisse cheeses and under stress conditions.
单独使用物种特异性定量实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)以及结合使用单叠氮化丙锭(PMA),并与平板计数法一起用于评估益生菌嗜酸乳杆菌La-5和动物双歧杆菌乳亚种Bb-12,以及产细菌素且具有潜在益生菌特性的清酒乳杆菌清酒亚种2a在整个保质期内暴露于体外模拟胃肠道条件下的合生元(F1)和益生菌(F2)小瑞士奶酪中的存活率。所研究的这三种菌株在6小时试验后活力均有所下降。通过平板计数和PMA-qPCR法,Bb-12显示出最高的存活能力,分别高于初始菌数的72.6%和74.6%,其菌数维持在6 log CFU/g或以上。菊粉和低聚果糖的益生元混合物并未为这些菌株提供针对模拟胃肠道环境的额外保护。在试验初始时,三种方法测得的微生物数量相当,证实主要存在活的且可培养的细胞。然而,随着体外试验各个阶段诱导的应激加剧,各方法之间的差异增大。扫描电子显微镜结果证实,对于与大量受损和死亡细菌混合的完整细菌群体的定量,qPCR不是一种可靠的计数方法。此外,平板计数的细菌数量比PMA-qPCR法低得多(P<0.05),这表明积累了无法形成菌落的应激或死亡微生物。PMA的使用克服了qPCR无法区分死细胞和活细胞的问题。本研究中PMA与物种特异性qPCR的结合,提供了一种快速且明确的方法,用于对纳入益生菌和合生元小瑞士奶酪并处于应激条件下的存活密切相关物种进行计数。