Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA.
Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Ecology. 2013 Oct;94(10):2334-45. doi: 10.1890/12-2018.1.
Climate change models predict that future precipitation patterns will entail lower-frequency but larger rainfall events, increasing the duration of dry soil conditions. Resulting shifts in microbial C cycling activity could affect soil C storage. Further, microbial response to rainfall events may be constrained by the physiological or nutrient limitation stress of extended drought periods; thus seasonal or multiannual precipitation regimes may influence microbial activity following soil wet-up. We quantified rainfall-driven dynamics of microbial processes that affect soil C loss and retention, and microbial community composition, in soils from a long-term (14-year) field experiment contrasting "Ambient" and "Altered" (extended intervals between rainfalls) precipitation regimes. We collected soil before, the day following, and five days following 2.5-cm rainfall events during both moist and dry periods (June and September 2011; soil water potential = -0.01 and -0.83 MPa, respectively), and measured microbial respiration, microbial biomass, organic matter decomposition potential (extracellular enzyme activities), and microbial community composition (phospholipid fatty acids). The equivalent rainfall events caused equivalent microbial respiration responses in both treatments. In contrast, microbial biomass was higher and increased after rainfall in the Altered treatment soils only, thus microbial C use efficiency (CUE) was higher in Altered than Ambient treatments (0.70 +/- 0.03 > 0.46 +/- 0.10). CUE was also higher in dry (September) soils. C-acquiring enzyme activities (beta-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, and phenol oxidase) increased after rainfall in moist (June), but not dry (September) soils. Both microbial biomass C:N ratios and fungal:bacterial ratios were higher at lower soil water contents, suggesting a functional and/or population-level shift in the microbiota at low soil water contents, and microbial community composition also differed following wet-up and between seasons and treatments. Overall, microbial activity may directly (C respiration) and indirectly (enzyme potential) reduce soil organic matter pools less in drier soils, and soil C sequestration potential (CUE) may be higher in soils with a history of extended dry periods between rainfall events. The implications include that soil C loss may be reduced or compensated for via different mechanisms at varying time scales, and that microbial taxa with better stress tolerance or growth efficiency may be associated with these functional shifts.
气候变化模型预测,未来的降水模式将导致低频但更大的降雨事件,从而延长土壤干燥的时间。这可能会导致微生物 C 循环活性的变化,从而影响土壤 C 储存。此外,微生物对降雨事件的反应可能受到延长干旱期的生理或养分限制压力的限制;因此,季节性或多年降水模式可能会影响土壤湿润后微生物的活性。我们量化了影响土壤 C 损失和保留的微生物过程的降雨驱动动态,以及在长期(14 年)田间实验中对比“自然”和“改变”(降雨间隔延长)降水模式的土壤微生物群落组成。在 2011 年 6 月和 9 月(土壤水势分别为-0.01 和-0.83 MPa)的湿润和干燥期,我们在 2.5-cm 降雨事件发生前、发生后一天和发生后五天收集了土壤,并测量了微生物呼吸、微生物生物量、有机质分解潜力(胞外酶活性)和微生物群落组成(磷脂脂肪酸)。在两种处理中,相同的降雨事件引起了相同的微生物呼吸反应。相比之下,只有在改变处理的土壤中,微生物生物量更高,并在降雨后增加,因此改变处理的微生物 C 使用效率(CUE)高于自然处理(0.70 +/- 0.03 > 0.46 +/- 0.10)。CUE 在干燥(9 月)土壤中也更高。在湿润(6 月)土壤中,降雨后 C 获取酶活性(β-葡萄糖苷酶、纤维二糖水解酶和酚氧化酶)增加,但在干燥(9 月)土壤中没有增加。微生物生物量 C:N 比和真菌:细菌比在较低的土壤含水量下更高,这表明在低土壤含水量下,微生物群落在功能和/或种群水平上发生了变化,并且在湿润后、季节和处理之间,微生物群落组成也不同。总的来说,在较干燥的土壤中,微生物活性可能会直接(C 呼吸)和间接(酶潜力)减少土壤有机质库,并且在具有延长降雨间隔历史的土壤中,土壤 C 封存潜力(CUE)可能更高。这意味着土壤 C 损失可能会通过不同的机制在不同的时间尺度上减少或补偿,并且具有更好的应激耐受或生长效率的微生物类群可能与这些功能变化有关。