Suppr超能文献

低骨密度与接受内固定治疗的股骨颈骨折患者的失败无关。

Low bone mineral density is not related to failure in femoral neck fracture patients treated with internal fixation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2014 Feb;85(1):60-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.875360. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Internal fixation (IF) in femoral neck fractures has high reoperation rates and some predictors of failure are known, such as age, quality of reduction, and implant positioning. Finding new predictors of failure is an ongoing process, and in this study we evaluated the importance of low bone mineral density (BMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

140 consecutive patients (105 females, median age 80) treated with IF had a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of the hip performed median 80 days after treatment. The patients' radiographs were evaluated for fracture displacement, implant positioning, and quality of reduction. From a questionnaire completed during admission, 2 variables for comorbidity and walking disability were chosen. Primary outcome was low hip BMD (amount of mineral matter per square centimeter of hip bone) compared to hip failure (resection, arthroplasty, or new hip fracture). A stratified Cox regression model on fracture displacement was applied and adjusted for age, sex, quality of reduction, implant positioning, comorbidity, and walking disability.

RESULTS

49 patients had a T-score below -2.5 (standard deviation from the young normal reference mean) and 70 patients had a failure. The failure rate after 2 years was 22% (95% CI: 12-39) for the undisplaced fractures and 66% (CI: 56-76) for the displaced fractures. Cox regression showed no association between low hip BMD and failure. For the covariates, only implant positioning showed an association with failure.

INTERPRETATION

We found no statistically significant association between low hip BMD and fixation failure in femoral neck fracture patients treated with IF.

摘要

背景与目的

股骨颈骨折内固定(IF)的返修率较高,已知一些失败的预测因素,如年龄、复位质量和植入物定位。寻找新的失败预测因素是一个持续的过程,在这项研究中,我们评估了低骨密度(BMD)的重要性。

患者和方法

140 例连续股骨颈骨折患者(105 例女性,中位年龄 80 岁)在治疗后中位 80 天接受双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)髋关节扫描。对患者的 X 线片进行骨折移位、植入物定位和复位质量评估。从入院时完成的问卷中选择了 2 个与合并症和步行障碍相关的变量。主要结局是低髋 BMD(每平方厘米髋骨的矿物质含量)与髋部失败(切除、关节置换或新的髋部骨折)比较。对骨折移位应用分层 Cox 回归模型,并调整年龄、性别、复位质量、植入物定位、合并症和步行障碍。

结果

49 例患者 T 评分低于-2.5(与年轻正常参考平均值的标准差),70 例患者发生失败。2 年后无移位骨折的失败率为 22%(95%CI:12-39),移位骨折的失败率为 66%(CI:56-76)。Cox 回归显示低髋 BMD 与失败之间无关联。对于协变量,只有植入物定位与失败相关。

结论

我们发现 IF 治疗股骨颈骨折患者的低髋 BMD 与固定失败之间没有统计学上的显著关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f70b/3940993/a48b1c2c85ba/ORT-85-60-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验