Chen Ko-Ta, Lu Hsien-Tsung, Lee Chian-Her, Wu Meng-Huang
Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Apr 9;16:21514593251330580. doi: 10.1177/21514593251330580. eCollection 2025.
The incidence of femoral neck fracture is increasing as society ages. Different types of cannulated screws can be used for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, but no screw selection protocol has been determined to reduce the risk of operation failure. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate differences in outcomes between using cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws for fixation in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.
Adults aged 18 years and older with non-displaced femoral neck fracture, admitted between February 2016 and January 2022, and received fixation using three screws in an inverted triangle configuration were selected for this retrospective study. After exclusions, patients were separated into four groups based on using different combinations of headed cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws. Postoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate operation failure, defined as nonunion or avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
After exclusions, 153 patients (median age 75.0, range 65.0-85.0) with majority of females (69.9%) were included. While the combination of one cannulated compression screw (CCS) and two headless compression screws (HCS) did not achieve statistical significance compared to other screw configurations ( = 0.073), it still demonstrated the lowest rate of operative failure (0.0%). Age was identified as the only significant factor associated with operative failure (adjusted OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.17; = 0.004).
No significant differences are found in outcomes between different combinations of cannulated headed compression screws and headless compression screws in an inverted triangle configuration for fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures.
随着社会老龄化,股骨颈骨折的发病率正在上升。不同类型的空心螺钉可用于股骨颈骨折的内固定,但尚未确定螺钉选择方案以降低手术失败风险。本回顾性研究旨在阐明使用空心加压螺钉和无头加压螺钉固定无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效差异。
选取2016年2月至2022年1月期间收治的18岁及以上无移位股骨颈骨折且采用倒三角形配置的三枚螺钉进行固定的成年人进行本回顾性研究。排除后,根据使用带帽空心加压螺钉和无头加压螺钉的不同组合将患者分为四组。术后使用计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像评估手术失败情况,手术失败定义为股骨头不愈合或缺血性坏死。
排除后,纳入153例患者(中位年龄75.0岁,范围65.0 - 85.0岁),其中女性占多数(69.9%)。虽然一枚空心加压螺钉(CCS)和两枚无头加压螺钉(HCS)的组合与其他螺钉配置相比未达到统计学意义(P = 0.073),但其手术失败率仍最低(0.0%)。年龄被确定为与手术失败相关的唯一显著因素(调整后OR:1.10;95%CI:1.03 - 1.17;P = 0.004)。
在使用倒三角形配置的带帽空心加压螺钉和无头加压螺钉的不同组合固定无移位股骨颈骨折时,疗效无显著差异。