Department of Community Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 21;13:1220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1220.
Health insurance is improving access to quality health care in Ghana. However, there are implementation challenges which call for reform of the current health insurance system. There is no doubt that reforming the current health insurance in Ghana is besieged with a myriad of problems due to misconceptions and misinformation. This study explored the perceptions and understanding of clients and health providers on the capitation payment system in the Kumasi metropolis.
The study employed a cross - sectional design and repeated surveys were conducted with a cohort of 422 NHIS policy holders aged 18-69 years in each survey. The surveys were conducted in every three months. Health service providers and clients from thirteen (13) Hospitals, seven (7) Maternity homes and twenty (20) Clinics were also interviewed. Data was collected with interviewer-administered questionnaires. STATA software (version 11) was used for cleaning, standardizing and analysing data.
A majority, 97.9% of the clients interviewed had heard of capitation payment although this did not translate into their level of understanding. About two-thirds, 61.2% disclosed that capitation was not important to them as clients are restricted to one Preferred Primary Provider (PPP) for a long period of time. About 94% of health providers also believed that people did not like the capitation payment system due to their misconception that it has been politicized (34%); does not give clients free choice of providers (26%) and capitation not covering most drugs (17%).
Although awareness of the capitation was high among clients, attitudes towards the capitation payment system were somewhat poor. A good understanding of the capitation payment system is key to ensuring client and provider acceptance and smooth implementation of the system.
健康保险正在改善加纳获得高质量医疗保健的机会。然而,实施过程中存在一些挑战,需要对当前的健康保险体系进行改革。毫无疑问,由于误解和错误信息,加纳现行健康保险的改革面临着诸多问题。本研究探讨了客户和医疗服务提供者对库马西大都市区人头付费制度的看法和理解。
该研究采用了横断面设计,并对 422 名年龄在 18-69 岁的 NHIS 保单持有人进行了重复调查。调查每三个月进行一次。还对来自 13 家医院、7 家产科病房和 20 家诊所的卫生服务提供者和客户进行了访谈。数据通过访谈者管理的问卷收集。使用 STATA 软件(版本 11)进行数据清理、标准化和分析。
大多数接受访谈的客户(97.9%)听说过人头付费,但这并没有转化为他们的理解程度。大约三分之二(61.2%)的客户表示,人头付费对他们来说并不重要,因为客户在很长一段时间内只能选择一个首选初级保健提供者。大约 94%的医疗服务提供者也认为,人们不喜欢人头付费制度,因为他们误解认为该制度已经政治化(34%);不给客户提供选择提供者的自由(26%),并且人头付费不能涵盖大多数药物(17%)。
尽管客户对人头付费的认识很高,但他们对人头付费制度的态度有些不佳。对头付费制度的充分理解是确保客户和提供者接受并顺利实施该制度的关键。