• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于价值的医疗保健支付在加纳国家健康保险计划下是否可行?

Is value-based payment for healthcare feasible under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme?

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.

Fuu D/A Junior High School, Ghana Education Service, Fuu, North East Gonja, Ghana.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00794-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-021-00794-y
PMID:34895235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8665306/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective payment mechanisms for healthcare are critical to the quality of care and the efficiency and responsiveness of health systems to meet specific population health needs. Since its inception, Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) has adopted fee-for-service, diagnostic-related groups and capitation methods, which have contributed to provider reimbursement delays, rising costs and poor quality of care rendered to the scheme's clients. The aim of this study was to explore stakeholder perceptions of the feasibility of value-based payment (VBP) for healthcare in Ghana. Value-based payment refers to a system whereby healthcare providers are paid for the value of services rendered to patients instead of the volume of services.

METHODS

This study employed a cross-sectional qualitative design. National-level stakeholders were purposively selected for in-depth interviews. The participants included policy-makers (n = 4), implementers (n = 5), public health insurers (n = 3), public and private healthcare providers (n = 7) and civil society organization officers (n = 1). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data analysis was performed using both deductive and inductive thematic analysis. The data were analysed using QSR NVivo 12 software.

RESULTS

Generally, participants perceived VBP to be feasible if certain supporting systems were in place and potential implementation constraints were addressed. Although the concept of VBP was widely accepted, study participants reported that efficient resource management, provider motivation incentives and community empowerment were required to align VBP to the Ghanaian context. Weak electronic information systems and underdeveloped healthcare infrastructure were seen as challenges to the integration of VBP into the Ghanaian health system. Therefore, improvement of existing systems beyond healthcare, including public education, politics, data, finance, regulation, planning, infrastructure and stakeholder attitudes towards VBP, will affect the overall feasibility of VBP in Ghana.

CONCLUSION

Value-based payment could be a feasible policy option for the NHIS in Ghana if potential implementation challenges such as limited financial and human resources and underdeveloped health system infrastructure are addressed. Governmental support and provider capacity-building are therefore essential for VBP implementation in Ghana. Future feasibility and acceptability studies will need to consider community and patient perspectives.

摘要

背景

有效的医疗保健支付机制对于医疗保健的质量以及卫生系统满足特定人群健康需求的效率和响应能力至关重要。自成立以来,加纳的国家健康保险计划(NHIS)一直采用按服务收费、诊断相关分组和人头付费方法,这导致了提供者报销延迟、成本上升和向该计划客户提供的医疗服务质量下降。本研究旨在探讨利益相关者对加纳基于价值的医疗保健支付(VBP)可行性的看法。基于价值的支付是指一种系统,根据该系统,医疗服务提供者根据向患者提供的服务的价值而不是服务量获得报酬。

方法

本研究采用了横断面定性设计。国家一级的利益相关者被有目的地选为深入访谈对象。参与者包括政策制定者(n=4)、实施者(n=5)、公共健康保险公司(n=3)、公共和私人医疗保健提供者(n=7)和民间社会组织官员(n=1)。访谈进行了录音和转录。使用演绎和归纳主题分析进行数据分析。数据使用 QSR NVivo 12 软件进行分析。

结果

一般来说,如果有适当的支持系统和潜在的实施限制得到解决,参与者认为 VBP 是可行的。尽管 VBP 的概念得到了广泛的认可,但研究参与者报告说,需要有效的资源管理、提供者激励措施和社区赋权,以使 VBP 与加纳的情况保持一致。电子信息系统薄弱和医疗基础设施欠发达被视为将 VBP 纳入加纳卫生系统的挑战。因此,除了医疗保健之外,对现有系统的改进,包括公共教育、政治、数据、金融、监管、规划、基础设施以及利益相关者对 VBP 的态度,将影响 VBP 在加纳的总体可行性。

结论

如果解决潜在的实施挑战,如有限的财务和人力资源以及欠发达的卫生系统基础设施,VBP 可能是加纳 NHIS 的可行政策选择。因此,政府的支持和提供者能力建设对于加纳的 VBP 实施至关重要。未来的可行性和可接受性研究需要考虑社区和患者的观点。

相似文献

1
Is value-based payment for healthcare feasible under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme?基于价值的医疗保健支付在加纳国家健康保险计划下是否可行?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00794-y.
2
Subscribers' perception of quality of services provided by Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme - what are the correlates?加纳国家医疗保险计划的订阅者对所提供服务质量的认知——相关因素有哪些?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4023-3.
3
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: provider payment and service supply behaviour and incentives in the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme--a systems approach.推进系统思维在卫生领域的应用:加纳国家健康保险计划中的提供者支付、服务供应行为及激励措施——一种系统方法
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 5;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-35.
4
Accrediting private providers with National Health Insurance to better serve low-income populations in Kenya and Ghana: a qualitative study.为了更好地服务肯尼亚和加纳的低收入人群,为私立医疗机构提供国家医疗保险认证:一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Dec 5;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0893-y.
5
How does it affect service delivery under the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana? Health providers and insurance managers perspective on submission and reimbursement of claims.它如何影响加纳国家健康保险计划下的服务提供?卫生提供者和保险管理人员对理赔提交和报销的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0247397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247397. eCollection 2021.
6
Provider preference for payment method under a national health insurance scheme: A survey of health insurance-credentialed health care providers in Ghana.在国家健康保险计划下,提供者对支付方式的偏好:加纳获得健康保险认证的医疗保健提供者的调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221195. eCollection 2019.
7
Does capitation payment under national health insurance affect subscribers' trust in their primary care provider? a cross-sectional survey of insurance subscribers in Ghana.国家医疗保险下的按人头付费是否会影响参保者对其初级医疗服务提供者的信任?加纳保险参保者的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1622-0.
8
Does the operations of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana align with the goals of Primary Health Care? Perspectives of key stakeholders in northern Ghana.加纳国家健康保险计划(NHIS)的运作是否符合初级卫生保健的目标?加纳北部主要利益相关者的观点。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0096-9.
9
Positioning the National Health Insurance for financial sustainability and Universal Health Coverage in Ghana: A qualitative study among key stakeholders.定位加纳国家健康保险以实现财务可持续性和全民健康覆盖:关键利益相关者的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0253109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253109. eCollection 2021.
10
Health Insurance Exemptions for Older Ghanaians: Stakeholder Perspectives on Challenges Confronting an Ambitious Policy.加纳老年人的健康保险豁免:利益相关者对面临挑战的雄心勃勃政策的看法。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 Jul 4;34(4):607-625. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2022.2046992. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The 'Health-2-Go' programme's impact on all-cause mortality and clinic utilisation for children 5 and under: a retrospective cohort analysis of an iCCM intervention in Ghana's Barekese Subdistrict.“健康出行”计划对5岁及以下儿童全因死亡率和门诊利用率的影响:对加纳巴雷凯塞分区综合社区病例管理干预措施的一项回顾性队列分析
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 13;10(3):e017786. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017786.
2
Leveraging local health system resources to address quality healthcare gaps in sub-Saharan African: lessons from the SafeCare quality improvement programme in Ghana.利用当地卫生系统资源解决撒哈拉以南非洲地区医疗质量差距问题:加纳 SafeCare 质量改进计划的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11961-6.
3
Regaining policy attention for a health insurance capitation payment reform in Ghana: A prospective policy analysis.重新唤起加纳医疗保险按人头付费改革的政策关注:一项前瞻性政策分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 30;4(5):e0003265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003265. eCollection 2024.
4
Remote Symptom Monitoring to Enhance the Delivery of Palliative Cancer Care in Low-Resource Settings: Emerging Approaches from Africa.远程症状监测在资源匮乏环境下提升癌症姑息治疗服务的效果:来自非洲的新方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 17;20(24):7190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247190.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform - A Scoping Literature Review.医疗服务提供者支付改革的障碍与促进因素——一项范围界定文献综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Sep 7;16:1755-1779. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S420529. eCollection 2023.
6
Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance.津巴布韦的不平等与私人医疗保险:历史、政治与绩效。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 29;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01868-9.
7
Beyond political will: unpacking the drivers of (non) health reforms in sub-Saharan Africa.超越政治意愿:剖析撒哈拉以南非洲地区(非)卫生改革的驱动因素
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010228.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in under-five mortality rate disaggregated across five inequality dimensions in Ghana between 1993 and 2014.1993 年至 2014 年间,加纳五个不平等维度下五岁以下儿童死亡率的趋势。
Public Health. 2021 Jul;196:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Why did Ghana's national health insurance capitation payment model fall off the policy agenda? A regional level policy analysis.为何加纳的国家医疗保险按人头付费模式从政策议程中消失了?一项区域层面的政策分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 25;36(6):869-880. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab016.
3
Potential gains in reproductive-aged life expectancy if maternal mortality were eradicated from the Kintampo districts of Central Ghana.如果加纳中部金塔波地区消除产妇死亡率,生殖期预期寿命可能会增加。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2515-0.
4
Barriers to payment reform: Experiences from nine Dutch population health management sites.支付方式改革的障碍:来自九个荷兰人口健康管理点的经验。
Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1100-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
5
Sociodemographic determinants of health insurance enrolment and dropout in urban district of Ghana: a cross-sectional study.加纳市区医疗保险参保及退保的社会人口学决定因素:一项横断面研究
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Jul 6;9(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0241-y.
6
Is enrolment in the national health insurance scheme in Ghana pro-poor? Evidence from the Ghana Living Standards Survey.加纳的全民健康保险计划是否有利于穷人?来自加纳生活水平调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 1;9(7):e029419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029419.
7
Value-based provider payment: towards a theoretically preferred design.基于价值的医疗服务提供者支付方式:迈向理论上更优的设计。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Jan;15(1):94-112. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000397. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
A reporting framework for describing and a typology for categorizing and analyzing the designs of health care pay for performance schemes.一个用于描述医疗保健绩效薪酬计划设计的报告框架以及用于对其进行分类和分析的类型学。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3479-x.
9
Preparing for the Transition to Value-Based Reimbursement: What You Need to Know.为向基于价值的报销模式转型做准备:你需要了解的内容。
J Med Pract Manage. 2017 Mar;32(5):313-316.
10
A Qualitative Study to Assess Barber Perceptions of the Feasibility of the Employer as a Health Advisor for Obesity Prevention.一项定性研究,旨在评估理发师对雇主作为肥胖预防健康顾问可行性的看法。
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1450-1462. doi: 10.1177/1557988318768586. Epub 2018 Apr 16.