Shapiro Adam R
Department of History, Classics and Archaeology, Birkbeck - University of London, Room G10, 28 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DQ, United Kingdom.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Mar;45:114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
This essay traces the divergent readings of William Paley's 1802 Natural Theology from its initial publication to the recent controversies over intelligent design. It argues that the misinterpretation of the Natural Theology as a scientific argument about the origins of complex life-which Darwin's Origin of Species refutes-did not develop all at once. Rather this reading evolved gradually, drawing from a variety of uses and appropriations during the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This study demonstrates the fluidity of "science" and "religion" during these centuries, and highlights the role that genres of science popularization play in altering the meaning of those categories.
本文追溯了从1802年威廉·佩利的《自然神学》首次出版到近期关于智能设计的争议期间,人们对该书的不同解读。文章认为,将《自然神学》误解为关于复杂生命起源的科学论证(达尔文的《物种起源》对其进行了驳斥)并非一蹴而就。相反,这种解读是逐渐演变而来的,它源自19世纪和20世纪期间的各种用途和挪用。这项研究展示了这几个世纪中“科学”和“宗教”的流动性,并突出了科学普及体裁在改变这些类别的意义中所起的作用。