The Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
School of Recreation, Health, and Tourism, George Mason University, 10900 University Blvd, Manassas, VA 20110, USA.
Hum Mov Sci. 2014 Feb;33:185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
During single-finger force production, the non-instructed fingers unintentionally produce force (finger enslaving). In this study, enslaving effects were compared between the dominant and non-dominant hands. The test consisted of a series of maximum voluntary contractions with different finger combinations. Enslaving matrices were calculated by means of training an artificial neural network. The dominant hand was found to be stronger, but there was found to be no difference between the overall enslaving effects in the dominant and non-dominant hands. There was no correlation between the magnitude of finger enslaving and the performance in such tests as the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, the Grooved Pegboard test, and the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test. Each one of those three tests showed a significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand performances. Eleven subjects were retested after two months, and it was found that enslaving effects did not fluctuate significantly between the two testing sessions. While the dominant and non-dominant hands are involved differently in everyday tasks, e.g. in writing or eating, this practice does not cause significant differences in enslaving between the hands.
在单指力产生过程中,非指令手指会无意识地产生力(手指奴役)。在这项研究中,比较了优势手和非优势手之间的奴役效应。测试由一系列不同手指组合的最大自主收缩组成。通过训练人工神经网络来计算奴役矩阵。结果发现,优势手更强壮,但在优势手和非优势手中,整体奴役效应没有差异。手指奴役的大小与爱丁堡手性测试、凹槽销钉板测试和 Jebsen-Taylor 手功能测试等测试中的表现之间没有相关性。这三个测试中的每一个都显示出优势手和非优势手表现之间的显著差异。11 名受试者在两个月后进行了复测,结果发现两次测试之间的奴役效应没有明显波动。虽然优势手和非优势手在日常任务中参与程度不同,例如在书写或进食时,但这种练习并不会导致双手之间奴役的显著差异。