Department of Electronic, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, via Golgi 39, Milan 20133, Italy; ForCardioLab, Fondazione per la Ricerca in Cardiochirurgia ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Electronic, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, via Golgi 39, Milan 20133, Italy; ForCardioLab, Fondazione per la Ricerca in Cardiochirurgia ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
J Biomech. 2014 Jan 22;47(2):329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.036. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
Aortic interleaflet triangle reshaping (AITR) is a surgical approach to aortic valve incontinence that involves placing three stitches at half of the interleaflet triangles height. In this work, the relationship between the actual stitch height and valve functioning, and the safety margin that the surgeon can rely on in applying the stitches were systematically investigated in vitro. AITR surgery was applied to six swine aortic roots placing the stitches empirically at 50%, 60% and 75% of the triangle heights. Then the actual stitch heights were measured and the hydrodynamic performances were evaluated with a pulsatile hydrodynamic mock loop. Actual stitch heights were 45±2%, 61±4% and 79±6%. As compared to untreated conditions, the 50% configuration induced a significant variation in the effective orifice area. With stitches placed at 60%, the mean systolic pressure drop increased significantly with respect to the untreated case, but no significant changes were recorded with respect to the 50% configuration. At 75%, all the hydrodynamic parameters of systolic valve functioning worsened significantly. Summarizing, the AITR technique, when performed in a conservative manner did not induce significant alterations in the hydrodynamics of the aortic root in vitro, while more aggressive configurations did. The absence of a statistically significant difference between the 50% and 60% configurations suggests that there is a reasonably limited risk of inducing valve stenosis in the post-op scenario due to stitch misplacement.
主动脉瓣叶间三角重塑术(AITR)是一种治疗主动脉瓣关闭不全的手术方法,包括在瓣叶间三角的一半高度处放置三枚缝线。在这项工作中,系统地研究了实际缝线高度与瓣叶功能之间的关系,以及外科医生在应用缝线时可以依靠的安全裕度。对六只猪主动脉根部进行 AITR 手术,将缝线经验性地放置在三角高度的 50%、60%和 75%处。然后测量实际缝线高度,并通过脉动流体力模拟回路评估水动力性能。实际缝线高度分别为 45±2%、61±4%和 79±6%。与未处理的情况相比,50%的缝线配置会导致有效瓣口面积发生显著变化。对于 60%的缝线配置,平均收缩压下降与未处理的情况相比显著增加,但与 50%的缝线配置相比没有显著变化。在 75%的缝线配置下,所有收缩期瓣叶功能的血流动力学参数均显著恶化。综上所述,AITR 技术以保守的方式进行时,不会在体外显著改变主动脉根部的水动力,但更激进的配置会。50%和 60%缝线配置之间没有统计学上的显著差异表明,由于缝线错位,术后发生瓣口狭窄的风险相当有限。