Bouchard Beth A, Gissel Matthew T, Whelihan Matthew F, Mann Kenneth G, Butenas Saulius
Department of Biochemistry, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
Department of Biochemistry, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Mar;1840(3):1188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.11.024. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
Expression of tissue factor (TF) antigen and activity in platelets is controversial and dependent upon the laboratory and reagents used. Two forms of TF were described: an oxidized functional form and a reduced nonfunctional form that is converted to the active form through the formation of an allosteric disulfide. This study tests the hypothesis that the discrepancies regarding platelet TF expression are due to differential expression of the two forms.
Specific reagents that recognize both oxidized and reduced TF were used in flow cytometry of unactivated and activated platelets and western blotting of whole platelet lysates. TF-dependent activity measurements were used to confirm the results.
Western blotting analyses of placental TF demonstrated that, in contrast to anti-TF#5, which is directed against the oxidized form of TF, a sheep anti-human TF polyclonal antibody recognizes both the reduced and oxidized forms. Flow cytometric analyses demonstrated that the sheep antibody did not react with the surface of unactivated platelets or platelets activated with thrombin receptor agonist peptide, PAR-1. This observation was confirmed using biotinylated active site-blocked factor (F)VIIa: no binding was observed. Likewise, neither form of TF was detected by western blotting of whole platelet lysates with sheep anti-hTF. Consistent with these observations, no FXa or FIXa generation by FVIIa was detected at the surface of these platelets. Similarly, no TF-related activity was observed in whole blood using thromboelastography.
Platelets from healthy donors do not express either oxidized (functional) or reduced (nonfunctional) forms of TF.
血小板中组织因子(TF)抗原和活性的表达存在争议,且取决于所使用的实验室和试剂。TF有两种形式:氧化的功能形式和还原的无功能形式,后者通过形成变构二硫键转化为活性形式。本研究检验了关于血小板TF表达差异是由于这两种形式的差异表达所致的假说。
使用能识别氧化型和还原型TF的特异性试剂,对未激活和激活的血小板进行流式细胞术检测,并对全血小板裂解物进行蛋白质印迹分析。采用TF依赖性活性测定来证实结果。
胎盘TF的蛋白质印迹分析表明,与针对TF氧化形式的抗TF#5不同,羊抗人TF多克隆抗体能识别还原型和氧化型TF。流式细胞术分析表明,该羊抗体不与未激活血小板表面或用凝血酶受体激动肽PAR-1激活的血小板表面发生反应。使用生物素化的活性位点封闭的因子(F)VIIa证实了这一观察结果:未观察到结合。同样,用羊抗人TF对全血小板裂解物进行蛋白质印迹分析时,未检测到任何一种形式TF。与这些观察结果一致,在这些血小板表面未检测到FVIIa诱导产生的FXa或FIXa。类似地,使用血栓弹力图在全血中未观察到与TF相关的活性。
健康供体的血小板不表达氧化型(功能性)或还原型(无功能性)TF。