Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Amiens, Amiens, France.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(2):363-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001251. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
Ejection fraction (EF) as a marker of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and the appropriate thresholds for diagnosing severe or mild/moderate LV dysfunction in mitral regurgitation are doubted and poorly followed in clinical practice. We aimed at assessing the role of EF in a large registry of organic mitral regurgitation to objectively establish thresholds for various degrees of LV dysfunction and to analyze whether mitral surgery remains beneficial in those subsets of patients.
We investigated the relation between EF and mortality in 1875 patients with mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflets in sinus rhythm (65±13 years; median EF, 66% [60%-71%]) enrolled in the Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) registry. With EF <60%, mortality after diagnosis increased precipitously under medical management (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.59 [1.19-2.12]) and during the entire follow-up (adjusted HR, 1.51 [1.22-1.87]). Severe LV dysfunction, if defined by EF <30%, would affect a minuscule number of patients (0.3%). Conversely, EF <45% was more frequent (2.9%) and was associated with considerable mortality under medical management (adjusted HR, 2.43 [1.50-3.95]) and during the entire follow-up (adjusted HR, 2.46 [1.67-3.61]). The group with EF of 45% to 60% represented a large proportion of patients (23%), exhibited rarely overt symptoms, and had higher mortality compared with EF >60%. Above 60%, no EF threshold further determined survival. The benefit of surgery remained considerable in the groups with EF <45% (adjusted HR, 0.28 [0.17-0.56]) and with EF of 45% to 60% (adjusted HR, 0.34 [0.21-0.64]).
EF is valuable in defining presence and severity of LV dysfunction in organic mitral regurgitation. Patients with EF <45% have severe LV dysfunction, catastrophic outcome under medical management, and should not be denied surgery. Although there is no survival gain with EF ranges >60%, with EF dropping <60%, mortality increases precipitously and prompt surgical referral is critical to outcome.
射血分数(EF)作为左心室(LV)功能障碍的标志物,以及在二尖瓣反流中诊断严重或轻度/中度 LV 功能障碍的适当阈值,在临床实践中受到质疑且未得到充分遵循。我们旨在评估 EF 在大规模有机二尖瓣反流注册研究中的作用,客观地确定各种 LV 功能障碍程度的阈值,并分析在这些患者亚组中二尖瓣手术是否仍然有益。
我们研究了 EF 与窦性节律中因连枷状瓣叶导致的二尖瓣反流的 1875 例患者(65±13 岁;中位 EF,66%[60%-71%])的死亡率之间的关系,这些患者均纳入二尖瓣反流国际数据库(MIDA)注册研究。在接受药物治疗的情况下,EF<60%的患者在诊断后死亡率急剧上升(校正后的危险比[HR],1.59[1.19-2.12]),并且在整个随访期间(校正后的 HR,1.51[1.22-1.87])也是如此。如果 EF<30%定义为严重 LV 功能障碍,那么只有极少数患者(0.3%)会受到影响。相反,EF<45%更为常见(2.9%),并且在接受药物治疗(校正后的 HR,2.43[1.50-3.95])和整个随访期间(校正后的 HR,2.46[1.67-3.61])的死亡率较高。EF 为 45%至 60%的患者群体比例较大(23%),表现出很少有明显症状,但死亡率高于 EF>60%的患者。EF 超过 60%时,没有 EF 阈值能进一步确定生存率。EF<45%(校正后的 HR,0.28[0.17-0.56])和 EF 为 45%至 60%(校正后的 HR,0.34[0.21-0.64])的患者群体中,手术的获益仍然相当可观。
EF 可用于定义有机二尖瓣反流中 LV 功能障碍的存在和严重程度。EF<45%的患者存在严重的 LV 功能障碍,药物治疗下的预后极差,不应拒绝手术。尽管 EF 范围>60%不会带来生存获益,但 EF 下降<60%时,死亡率会急剧上升,及时转介手术对预后至关重要。